Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 3/8/2006 7:03:40 PM EDT
Tell me I'm not nuts but my 30-06 seems to kicks less then a .308 M1A. Maybe I'm just been shooting my Garand so long that anything else doesn't feel right but when I shot a friends M1A it seemed to be more noticeable.  I was thinking perhaps it was due to the longer gas piston giving the Garand a softer felt recoil even though it clearly has more muzzle flip? Now I know the 30-06 Garand bucks more. There was a firearms related show recently on the outdoor Channel, "maybe American Rifleman" It featured both rifles and the Garand cleanly jumped around more.. Perhaps it's rather like the 40 S@W Compared to the .45 ACP. The 45 is a slow push backwards where the .40 is a sharp snap. So am I crazy or does the Garand have less felt recoil then the m1A
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 8:10:34 PM EDT
[#1]
I've noticed that same phenomenon. IMO, it is because the M1 has better balance than the M14/M1A.
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 8:35:00 PM EDT
[#2]
Any chance you guys have synthetic stocks on your M1A's?

Garands are heavier.

Heavier = Less felt recoil.

tk
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 8:49:20 PM EDT
[#3]
The M1A I fired is heavier than my Garand. It was a Super Match with heavy match bbl. Yes, it did have a synthetic McMillan stock, but it still weighed about 12 pounds empty. That is a good couple pounds heavier than my M1, but my M1 still felt like it had less kick. The only way I can explain it is that the M1 Garand has a better balance and feel for me.
Link Posted: 3/8/2006 8:49:40 PM EDT
[#4]
i agree w/TK.  i had a scout m1a and swapped for m1.   never been happier w/a decision.
Link Posted: 3/9/2006 12:21:52 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
I've noticed that same phenomenon. IMO, it is because the M1 has better balance than the M14/M1A.



Ditto on that.........  I've never really enjoyed shooting the M1A/M14.  However, I absolutely love the Garand.  The Garand for me is the perfect iron sighted battle rifle.
Link Posted: 3/9/2006 2:16:53 AM EDT
[#6]
I notice the opposite:  I own both and I think the M1 kicks slightly more.
Link Posted: 3/9/2006 5:12:29 AM EDT
[#7]
M1A was a bit more noticable and had about 70 fps over the 30.06.  (XM80 vs PS Korean)
Link Posted: 3/9/2006 12:03:55 PM EDT
[#8]
I get beat up pretty bad in the face when I shoot the M1 (I normally shoot a 14lb M1A).
Link Posted: 3/9/2006 12:52:30 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 3/9/2006 4:50:44 PM EDT
[#10]
I think the M1A is the softest shooting 7.62 rifle I can think of. Rather ingenious gas piston design.
Link Posted: 3/9/2006 5:08:54 PM EDT
[#11]
Yer all weenies raised on the AR. For Shame!!!!

Thats said I do not notice much of a difference between the two. All of mine are wood stocked.
Link Posted: 3/11/2006 11:32:52 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
The M1A vents excess gas, while ALL the gas is used in operating the M1.

Given milspec .30-06 and 7.62 NATO ball, which fire roughly the same weight projectile at the same MV, it's a toss-up.   The cartridges' energy is almost exactly the same.

The M1 has a more violent action, but then the M1A is (usually) a bit lighter.



You've touched on what I was going to add here, raf.

The projectile weight is the same. The muzzle velocity is the same, ~2700fps. But the .30-06 has a larger case/chamber, and can be safely loaded to ~2900fps velocities (but not in a Garand). Therefore the 2700fps load has less chamber pressure in the bigger .30-06 cartridge than the smaller 7.62 Nato cartridge, correct? So a lower pressure round would "kick" less than a higher pressure round, all other things equal. Right? Somehow it makes sense to me.

FWIW, I've only shot two .308 rifles, but own about 5 or 6 .30-06's. One was an M40-clone (w/Remy reciever) that shot the 168gr match loads. Felt about like my 03a3 Springfield. The other was an M40a1 clone with a Model 40 receiver that shot the heavier (180-190 gr load?) bullet. For a 13 lb gun it kicked like a flippn' mule! But both were lazer beam accurate.
Link Posted: 3/11/2006 4:55:56 PM EDT
[#13]
M1's in 30 and 7.62 cal do shoot softer than a 7.62 cal M14/M1a.

It's all in the design of the two different gas systems.  A standard issue loaded M1 and a loaded M14 are pretty much the same weight at Approx 10-11 lbs.

Link Posted: 3/11/2006 5:06:33 PM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
M1's in 30 and 7.62 cal do shoot softer than a 7.62 cal M14/M1a.

It's all in the design of the two different gas systems.  A standard issue loaded M1 and a loaded M14 are pretty much the same weight at Approx 10-11 lbs.




I guess it's subjective. I have a 308 M1 and a Loaded M1A.  Same weight.  Shooting Hirt ammo thru each, I think the recoil force is the same, but the M1 is much more violent than the M1A.  Like the difference between driving a Camaro and a Cadillac.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top