User Panel
Posted: 8/22/2017 9:54:50 AM EDT
SSD - SIG SAUER Launches MCX Rattler
Next, I asked him why they built it. Hanley answered, “Everything was designed to be as discrete and small as possible with this gun.” Quite simply, customers came to them and asked for a Subgun size weapon in 5.56mm or .300 BLK. This is the result of that work.
Initially, they leveraged the MCX short stroke piston design, but quickly found that the upper would have been longer than the 5.5? barrel. Instead, they developed two separate gas systems, one for the .300 and a second for the 5.56. View Quote So this is why they had to build the Virtus with the shorter top -rail. 5.5" bbl 16" Folded 23.5" Unfolded I don't see the need for a 5.5" 5.56 gun, but it does reinforce the modularity of the system. |
|
Never really had any interest in the MCX but that is a pretty nice little setup.
|
|
Quoted:
I don't see the need for a 5.5" 5.56 gun, but it does reinforce the modularity of the system. View Quote It does? It's not compatible with any existing MCX. You cannot use a suppressor with it. And the 5.56 and 300BLK versions use completely different gas systems. Are they really saying they made this because people were asking for it?! |
|
So the rattler uppers are DI instead of piston; interesting. I just want to know if its compatible with regular MCX lowers. It seems like the lower is the same dimensions but different styling. I already have an original MCX SBR pending transfer but I would mind having one of these. We need Coregon in here to answer some specifics.
|
|
Is this the LVAW? Looks pretty sick. Sure hope that it works with regular MCX lowers, as I've got a SBR'd one.
Sig, thanks for innovating while all other companies were just rehashing the AR. Also, hire me for something. |
|
Quoted:
So the rattler uppers are DI instead of piston; interesting. I just want to know if its compatible with regular MCX lowers. It seems like the lower is the same dimensions but different styling. I already have an original MCX SBR pending transfer but I would mind having one of these. We need Coregon in here to answer some specifics. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
So the rattler uppers are DI instead of piston; interesting. I just want to know if its compatible with regular MCX lowers. It seems like the lower is the same dimensions but different styling. I already have an original MCX SBR pending transfer but I would mind having one of these. We need Coregon in here to answer some specifics. I don't see where it says DI. Just that the pistons aren't identical between the 2 calibers and they needed to modify them from the standard MCX. Quoted:
It does? It's not compatible with any existing MCX. You cannot use a suppressor with it. And the 5.56 and 300BLK versions use completely different gas systems. Are they really saying they made this because people were asking for it?! The modularity is focused around what you can do with the upper at a base level. This is the first gun that doesn't have the modular forward assist. The upper can go from a 5.5" to 16" bbl. When the Virtus came out it was explained by @Coregon they shortened the top of the Virtus because it needed to be compatible with even shorter configurations. This seems to be a virtus upper with a 5.5" bbl on it. And gas System is part of the bbl assembly, not the upper. According to TFB it fits the recent SOCOM RFI for a stupidly short M4 compatible upper. Quoted:
Is this the LVAW? Looks pretty sick. Sure hope that it works with regular MCX lowers, as I've got a SBR'd one. Sig, thanks for innovating while all other companies were just rehashing the AR. Also, hire me for something. No, this isn't LVAW. This looks to be a response to the recent SOCOM PDW RFI. TFB just updated their article with more pictures and really good size comparisons. |
|
Slightly smaller folded stock, too. Comb height, LOP, buttpad size, and angle look changed.
Hell, I might be interested just in the stock. |
|
I saw the stock too. Not bad.
in 5.56 that may be loud.... and warm |
|
Sounds like they are going to sell upper separately. If its compatible with my original mcx lower I might just get one of the new PDW stocks and the rattler 300blk upper. That was I can go 9 inch suppressed or really short 300blk with rattler. I assume my sig 762TIQD is rated for barrel that short in 300blk.
|
|
Quoted:
Sounds like they are going to sell upper separately. If its compatible with my original mcx lower I might just get one of the new PDW stocks and the rattler 300blk upper. That was I can go 9 inch suppressed or really short 300blk with rattler. I assume my sig 762TIQD is rated for barrel that short in 300blk. View Quote |
|
I was thinking only with subs. Might be worth asking sig about ratings though.
|
|
I already have the 6.75" 300Blk MCX...For me, I honestly cannot see the justification in spending the $2700 asking price to lose 1.25"
The fact they even bothered with tooling to make a 5.56 barrel for this is pretty hilarious I think. 5.5" with 55gr, what is that? 1750 fps? And it can't be suppressed? Think I'll take a solid pass on that one. Ballistics from the 5.5" 300blk however are more forgiving... but still. Honestly I think the only thing I'm truly excited for is that new stock thats pictured on it, and that the article says we might start seeing these mythic AR lower adapters. I was really hoping Sig's big news today was going to be announcing a release of the 308 CSASS MCX they showed a year or so ago...That, would get my money for sure. |
|
Quoted:
The fact they even bothered with tooling to make a 5.56 barrel for this is pretty hilarious I think. 5.5" with 55gr, what is that? 1750 fps? And it can't be suppressed? Think I'll take a solid pass on that one. View Quote It's an... Odd request. But I'd defer to SOCOM in what needs they have. |
|
|
Quoted:
Sandman View Quote Anyways, guess I don't see why suppressing is a deal breaker. The whole point is to have a rifle that fits in a shoulder holster. It's a very narrow usage criteria this was designed for. Im sure you can put a can on it. But it's not really designed with that in mind and will probably negatively affect function (and the can). |
|
I kind of like that pistol grip, too. Honestly, I'm intrigued by this thing. I know that the ballistics of any 5" barrel rifle cartridge are going to suck, but probably a damn sight more powerful and potentially accurate than a pistol. If the upper isn't a stupid price, I may buy one eventually.
I hope that Coregon has some insight on this. |
|
Quoted:
I'd be interested in seeing where they'd rate it that short. Anyways, guess I don't see why suppressing is a deal breaker. The whole point is to have a rifle that fits in a shoulder holster. It's a very narrow usage criteria this was designed for. Im sure you can put a can on it. But it's not really designed with that in mind and will probably negatively affect function (and the can). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Sandman Anyways, guess I don't see why suppressing is a deal breaker. The whole point is to have a rifle that fits in a shoulder holster. It's a very narrow usage criteria this was designed for. Im sure you can put a can on it. But it's not really designed with that in mind and will probably negatively affect function (and the can). |
|
For subsonic 300s, sure this is great. when you start with a speed limit, the barrel length dont matter much. So long as the 200+ grain projectiles get up near the speed of sound, that it. Even with out a suppressor adding weight and length, it would be fun to shoot.
Now if we are talking 5.56, thats just silly. All you would get is a flash-bang ever time you pull the trigger. thats fun for the first 3 rounds. then its just annoying. Never mind terminal ballistics of 55grain M193 going like 1850 fps, which is the normal velocity at like 300 meters. I just dont see it. |
|
Quoted:
For subsonic 300s, sure this is great. when you start with a speed limit, the barrel length dont matter much. So long as the 200+ grain projectiles get up near the speed of sound, that it. Even with out a suppressor adding weight and length, it would be fun to shoot. Now if we are talking 5.56, thats just silly. All you would get is a flash-bang ever time you pull the trigger. thats fun for the first 3 rounds. then its just annoying. Never mind terminal ballistics of 55grain M193 going like 1850 fps, which is the normal velocity at like 300 meters. I just dont see it. View Quote |
|
Hey Gents - sorry I'm late to the party, have a couple of weeks of travel behind me now.
I snapped a few more pictures, just for y'all to see something other than stock photos. Let me know if you have any questions. Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
Will my 762Ti QD be rated for the 5.5" 300blk rattler? will rattler upper drop onto my legacy mcx? Is the rattler smaller pdw side folder going to be sold separately?
|
|
Neat little gun. Hopefully I'll see one soon at the Sig Pro Shop.
|
|
Coregon,
Thank you for those pics. Do you have any pics of the 5.5" 5.56 barrel? Also will the 5.56 barrel be reliable at that length? Thank you. |
|
My bitch is, they still don't have parts for the MCX. Yeah, more cool pics of new stuff but no spare parts and no availability in sight.
|
|
Quoted:
My bitch is, they still don't have parts for the MCX. Yeah, more cool pics of new stuff but no spare parts and no availability in sight. View Quote |
|
|
Not my picture, but taken by a good buddy of mine while shooting at the SIG Sauer Academy
Attached File |
|
Cool pic. Whats the Rattler ship date? I heard late September.
|
|
Sorta want.
I kinda like it. I just want one in 308. If we're going to make an abortion of a PDW, lets just fucking go for it. |
|
I called Sig yesterday and asked if the 762qd suppressor would be ok on a 5.5 barrel (I have one in jail right now). The guy was very adamant that their suppressor is just fine on the rattler and they run the crap out of them suppressed.
|
|
|
I just want the stock. Does sig have a part number for that guy?
|
|
|
Quoted:
Honestly I think the only thing I'm truly excited for is that new stock thats pictured on it, and that the article says we might start seeing these mythic AR lower adapters. . View Quote I want a short 300BLK with my Sandman tucked under a M-LOK handguard. |
|
Quoted:
I'd like to see that as well. I want a short 300BLK with my Sandman tucked under a M-LOK handguard. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Honestly I think the only thing I'm truly excited for is that new stock thats pictured on it, and that the article says we might start seeing these mythic AR lower adapters. . I want a short 300BLK with my Sandman tucked under a M-LOK handguard. Along with the AR lower adapter, I'd like to get the trip lever and pin that holds it in place that goes into the slot on the rear left side of the MCX upper. The trip lever functions to trip the auto sear in the M16 lower providing for full auto fire. I said I'd provide proof of M16 ownership. He said it's not available for sale. If I was a smarty, I'd have said since it's not available for sale, how about for free! If I was a real smarty, I could post his name and complete email address so he could be deluged with questions and comments. But I am patient, but at 69 years old, I don't have infinite time. Finally, I'll ask this again. If anyone knows what bbl steel SIG uses in its MCX, I'd appreciate knowing. Running long term bbl wear testing and want to know where SIG's MCX bbls fit with other maker's bbls. SIG won't tell me so far...says it's proprietary. I said if it's good steel, they ought to be proud of it and say so in advertising. Other bbl makers were happy to give me their bbl info. Edited to add: The Marketing Direction sent me a quick note today (Sept 6th) that he's out with a family emergency, and that he's passed my question onto another SIG employee to answer. |
|
Of course you can't get the part. The next model will be the sidewinder and after that the swindler, heard a final series will be the carpetbagger.
|
|
|
For those wondering why SIG built a new MCX variant so soon or why it's so short
http://www.wearethemighty.com/articles/this-new-mini-rifle-could-replace-the-decades-old-mp5-for-delta-force-and-seal-team-6 In March, U.S. Special Operation Command posted a notice to industry to come up with a new so-called “personal defense weapon” that had nearly impossible specs to achieve. The weapon had to be no longer than 26 inches with the stock extended, had to collapse to less than 17 inches AND be able to fire from the collapsed configuration. And oh, the weapon had to be made to fire both .300 Blackout cartridges and 5.56 rounds. View Quote |
|
I have an SBR'd AR lower. I would really like a folding shorty .300 like this, but maybe a little bit longer barrel.
Am I understanding correctly that although they are listing a pistol with brace and an SBR for sale now, they will be offering a turnkey kit that will work on an AR SBR lower? If so, will this kit allow use of the currently available 6.75" and/or 9" barrel, or would the new gas system mean any future different barrel lengths would have to be made specifically for this version? |
|
Quoted:
I have an SBR'd AR lower. I would really like a folding shorty .300 like this, but maybe a little bit longer barrel. Am I understanding correctly that although they are listing a pistol with brace and an SBR for sale now, they will be offering a turnkey kit that will work on an AR SBR lower? If so, will this kit allow use of the currently available 6.75" and/or 9" barrel, or would the new gas system mean any future different barrel lengths would have to be made specifically for this version? View Quote Barrels should come with the appropriate length gas system. You should be able to throw any bbl/oprod combo on the upper /lower |
|
Quoted:
Not my picture, but taken by a good buddy of mine while shooting at the SIG Sauer Academy https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/232800/FullSizeRender-295195.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Every picture and video I am seeing of the rattler has an rmr style sight mounted to it. Is this just coincidence or are users favoring this setup? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Not my picture, but taken by a good buddy of mine while shooting at the SIG Sauer Academy https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/232800/FullSizeRender-295195.JPG |
|
Thanks. Are people favoring using risers with the rattler? Tough to tell how the small stock will interface with the sight.
|
|
|
Hopefully you can answer. How is the recoil on it in 300 blk also the side concussions? How is the trigger. I have no use for the rattler but can't help to really want one and may try to reserve one tomorrow. Just want to make sure I could shoot a couple hundred rounds before I annoy everyone around me. Actually it may be a good way to get the range to myself
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.