I posted about this once before
over here. But then photobucket went and broke the Internet, making that post less useful. So since someone asked about it the other day, I thought I'd try to post a condensed (maybe) version.
I had run a few thousand commercially coated 9mm through a Bowers VERS-9s. This was a mix of 124 and 147 gr. bullets. What I found was I get a buildup in the can as bad as or worse than shooting bare (lubed) lead. The cone of crud building up around the aperture in the blast baffle had restricted the opening to the point a bullet could not fit through without rubbing hard. I'm guessing I wasn't too far from doing some serious damage to the can.
Here's what the blast baffle looked like:
I had only been crimping enough to take out the flare in the case mouth. And no, I hadn't been shaving bullets as they seated. The barrel was a surplus Uzi SMG barrel, and had gotten pretty dirty. So I didn't know if the bore crud was scraping coating as the bullet pushed through the barrel.
So I scrubbed the barrel spotless and did an experiment. One suggestion had been that the bullets need to fit the bore pretty closely to keep from leaving the coating behind. In slugging a few barrels, I found most of my 9mm barrels were on the generous side. It turns out I had been shooting .356" bullets through a .3575" barrel. So I wanted to try some side-by-side testing with those bullets, and then with something that fit more closely to the bore.
I didn't want to crud up a pair of silencers (although I almost used it as an excuse to get another one). Instead, I used a Bowers muzzle brake. It's made from the same aluminum tubing, and uses the same mounts and end caps as the silencers. Starting with two new end caps, I ran 400 rounds of the .356" bullets through one, weighing the endcap before and after. I then put a new endcap on and ran 400 rounds through that one (I scrubbed the barrel clean between tests too). I was able to find some .358" bullets for this one. Ammo was shot primarily in short bursts. No big mag dumps.
Here's what the brake looks like:
The end result was the .356" bullets left 2.5 times more residue on the endcap than the .358" bullets did. I thought that was pretty good!
A comment on the buildup: it was pretty hard, and not all that easy to remove. I ended up soaking it in solvent for a while, then scrubbing with a copper scouring pad. I found it much more difficult to remove than lead/carbon buildup would have been on a similar surface.
Here's a closer look at the stuff on the endcaps. Keep in mind, this is after only 400 rounds:
Not content to leave things at that, I thought I'd try the same experiment using some fully plated bullets. I have a bunch of Berry's 147 gr. bullets that mic out at .3555". So these would be "undersized" for my barrel as well. The results after 400 rounds was that I only picked up only 2.2 gr. buildup. The coated .358" bullets gave me 8x more, and the .356" bullets a whopping 18x more!
Before:
After:
Endcap:
So after all of this, I still like and shoot poly-coated bullets. They are an economical alternative to plated or jacketed, and can be pushed harder than bare lead. I just don't shoot them through my suppressors any more than I do bare lead.
One other comment: Please don't misinterpret this to mean that one brand of bullets is "bad", and the other "good". Rather, one brand of bullets was not a good fit for my particular barrel. I still have a few thousand of these, and they shoot very well with little to no buildup in the barrel. And I intend to order more when I'm out. I'll just continue using jacketed or plated for my quiet shooting.