
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Slimjim:
I think i have him ready to buy a Hogster 25, but how does it compare to the AGM linked above, thats a great looking deal, but how does it perform?
View Quote
AGM has a 3 year warranty like ATN. Neither has stellar records of customer service if you believe the internet. AGM warranty repair is usually a 1/1 swap for a major component failure. Bering has a 4 year warranty and decent customer service site in TX.
The Hogster has the option of adding a 16650 battery cap. Its nothing to some, it's significant to others. The AGM does not.
The hogster 35 has a better image than the TS35 in poor thermal conditions like high humidity. I was still fine scanning with the hogster when he said his optic image was unusable at our 150yd area of interest. The hogster line is definitely remarkable in those environments but you have to decide if you even want to be out in them to see any benefit from it. It's always sack stick to the inside of your leg or ice freezing to your eyebrows type deal when it really makes the most difference.
The AGM produces a better background detail than the Bering algorithm. That is a big this to some but not to others. I've personally never cared to hunt background trees but my buddy does say that he can range estimate better with it. Again, not a thing to me because it's a short range optic IMO and external ballistics of an intermediate cartridge don't care.
The added utility of that hand held is a pretty big thing to me though and IMO you have to weigh it against the utility of a better rifle scope image in poor conditions. The handheld is not going to be crystal clear but it's proven fairly effective for him at locating target sized animals out to 200 or so and then he gets on the scope to ID them quickly.
Good luck