Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
People asked for a Ruger forum because they got tired of other folks calling out Bill Ruger for the traitorous scumbag that he was. They all hide in there with their guns made with the blood money of our forefathers.
Same deal with SIG, although they are just a little embarrassed about owning a SIG I think. Kinda like the Armalite/AR10 crowd.
In short its the folks that want to live in their own little world of delusion, where they can say stupid shit like "people badmouth the SCAR because they cant afford one", "AR10s have a bad reputation because everyone has been calling all those other 308 ARs that were made in the '90s AR10s" and not have to deal with the fallout such remarks inevitably attract.
Interesting. Please provide the facts behind the treason charge against Bill Rger.
He lobbied congress for a magazine ban. He also is on record saying:
"No honest man needs more than 10 rounds in any gun."
"I never meant for simple civilians to have my 20 or 30 round magazines or my folding stock."
"I see nothing wrong with waiting periods."
Reference
I thought so. If you care to start an original thread about this subject, we can discuss the subject there, rather than hijack this thread.
All I will say here and now is that you (and others) have been misinformed about the complete situation.
Now, back on-topic, please.
Speaking of which, my answer to whether or not a new forum should be created is always the same: Demonstrate sufficient interest.
Doing so is as follows: Create a topic in GD Firearms on whether or not a Remington forum should be created. (I assume you are referring to modern Remington firearms, which are pretty much exclusively rifles, No?) Include in the topic a POLL with YES, NO, and DON'T CARE choices.
I will monitor the thread, and take the pulse of the community. No fair bumping the thread; let it sink or swim on its' own merits. Fair enough?