Check out the following link for the overview of the topic. CLINTON refused Intel. on our enemies. WHY?
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011130/ts/attack_article_dc_1.html
This is a story that may have an interesting twist. How did Bin Laden get away from the Clinton Administration? Why didn’t he feel the burn for his actions, especially after Clinton said he would go after those responsible for the attacks in Saudi Arabia, Africa, and Yemen? Lets consider the track records of the mentioned government officials, Bill Clinton and his administration.
In 1996 The Sudan offered to arrest Bin Laden. Clinton said NO
In May 1996 White house asked Sudan to allow Bin Laden to leave the country.
after many more attempts to give the US the edge, the Whitehouse refused.
There was no response to an extradition offer in 2000, AFTER the embassay bombings. What the heck was the Whitehouse doing?
Here is a guess. Could it be possible that Clinton took a dive on the issue? Clinton took money to free Mark Rich. Proof is out there that many cash exchanges were made for pardons, which falls into line with the Clinton version of democracy. How much did the Clintons take from the Bin Ladens to allow him and his cronies to continue?
If this were true, then there would be one more arrest to be made before all of this is over, along with 6000 murder charges to be added to the 20-some that are up in the air in Arkansas. This is a story that should be investigated before there is another banquet or awards ceremony to honor this traitor and his buddies.
The following is a great forum on the subject
http://www.lucianne.com/threads2.asp?artnum=156137