Quoted: 1911's are great pistols.
|
That's about the only part of your post that has a ring of truth to it.
Government Models, when chambered in .45 ACP, by no means need to use a ramped barrel. Although a ramped barrel
might prove helpful when using high-pressure cartridges, they are not necessary in order to make a 1911 reliable. Proper fit of the barrel to the feed ramp and a barrel throat job ensure reliable feeding with all ammo types. Furthermore the gun was designed around the .45 ACP and originally intended to be used with that cartridge, unsupported barrel and all. Conventional 1911's can easily handle all major .45 ACP loads including +P's and don't need a fully supported chamber to do it. Bare in mind the .45 ACP cartridge proceeded the gun.
"Full length slides"? Well the slide on a Government Model has always been 'full length'. The gun started as a 5" and is still made that way. Some manufactures have introduced 'long slides' with 6" barrels but I'm not sure how that would qualify as an improvement. What I think you meant was full-length dust cover, which is by no means necessary or an improvement. The extended dust cover on Baer's Monolith is simply to increase weight and accommodate the option of an accessory rail. Necessary?
Porting a gun can help reduce muzzle flip and may be applicable for games but try firing the gun from a retention position. Porting is a modification that should be looked at with hard eye, if you don't
need it don't put it on your gun. The best tool to control muzzle flip and recoil is the shooter. Additionally, porting a carry gun is something I would recommend someone think twice about.
The extractor on the 1911, although finicky, is more than adequate and in some regards superior to a spring-loaded extractor. Most of the trouble caused with a 1911s extractor can be traced to a simple mis-fitting or mis-use. Shade tree gunsmiths far too eager to "make the gun better" often screw up a properly tuned extractor. Lack of understanding of how the extractor works and fits in to the gun often result in failures to feed and failures to extract. Dropping the slide on a chambered cartridge, forcing the extractor to 'jump' the case rim in order to engage, also doesn't fair well with a 1911 and is a sure-fire way to 'need a better extractor'. Variances in materials (cast, MIM, etc.) also causes 1911 extractors to seem less reliable than they really are and make some feel the need to improve on the design. A bar stock extractor properly fitted to the gun will be as reliable as any one component can be and statistically more reliable than multi part extractors such as those in Sigs and the like. As Cooper once opined, if one is used to an outhouse there will be no need for indoor plumbing.
Is the 1911 perfect? No, but it also doesn't need any of the above referenced modifications to make it more perfect or correct any perceived ‘flaws’. In the end run the shooter will decide.