Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 7/26/2013 7:53:20 PM EDT
What works the best with the helmet and OCC dial system as just a stand alone active muff?  What if you want to have some radio connectivity as well?
Link Posted: 7/26/2013 8:16:21 PM EDT
[#1]
MsA sordid,  TCI liberators
Link Posted: 7/26/2013 8:27:50 PM EDT
[#2]
Here is a link to my current civi comms setup with NV helmet.

It is using an Ops Core fast base jump, but should be analogous to your ballistic rig fitment wise.  There are other options that don't require unlatching the OCC from the helmet and simultaneously donning/doffing the helmet and headset, but this is what I have found to work best for me.  YMMV.  There are also configurations available with either greater or lesser comms sophistication....i.e. encryption, true dual-channel input, etc.

For basic electronic ear pro, MSA/Sordin is tough to beat, and TCI also offers their "digital threat compression" technology which is presumably an electronic enhancement based on the same platform.  My understanding of the theory behind it is that rather than fully clamping the stereophonic input signal at or about 85 db, it attenuates the inputs to an acceptable level.  The bigger brains than me can very likely explain it better, but I just know what works well through use.

Hope this helps.

ETA - SC-Texas types faster than me, and we are both running essentially the same gear with VHF programmed to the same freqs.

ETA2 - If you are in the area, I have two of everything if you'd like to try it out firsthand.
Link Posted: 7/27/2013 9:27:36 AM EDT
[#3]
Link Posted: 7/27/2013 11:30:17 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Here is a link to my current civi comms setup with NV helmet.

It is using an Ops Core fast base jump, but should be analogous to your ballistic rig fitment wise.  There are other options that don't require unlatching the OCC from the helmet and simultaneously donning/doffing the helmet and headset, but this is what I have found to work best for me.  YMMV.  There are also configurations available with either greater or lesser comms sophistication....i.e. encryption, true dual-channel input, etc.

For basic electronic ear pro, MSA/Sordin is tough to beat, and TCI also offers their "digital threat compression" technology which is presumably an electronic enhancement based on the same platform.  My understanding of the theory behind it is that rather than fully clamping the stereophonic input signal at or about 85 db, it attenuates the inputs to an acceptable level.  The bigger brains than me can very likely explain it better, but I just know what works well through use.

Hope this helps.

ETA - SC-Texas types faster than me, and we are both running essentially the same gear with VHF programmed to the same freqs.

ETA2 - If you are in the area, I have two of everything if you'd like to try it out firsthand.
View Quote


Where in Texas are you?  I'm in the Port Arthur/Beaumont area.  I'd love to try out your setup.
Link Posted: 7/27/2013 1:41:02 PM EDT
[#5]
IM sent.
Link Posted: 7/27/2013 3:45:50 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Where in Texas are you?  I'm in the Port Arthur/Beaumont area.  I'd love to try out your setup.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Here is a link to my current civi comms setup with NV helmet.

It is using an Ops Core fast base jump, but should be analogous to your ballistic rig fitment wise.  There are other options that don't require unlatching the OCC from the helmet and simultaneously donning/doffing the helmet and headset, but this is what I have found to work best for me.  YMMV.  There are also configurations available with either greater or lesser comms sophistication....i.e. encryption, true dual-channel input, etc.

For basic electronic ear pro, MSA/Sordin is tough to beat, and TCI also offers their "digital threat compression" technology which is presumably an electronic enhancement based on the same platform.  My understanding of the theory behind it is that rather than fully clamping the stereophonic input signal at or about 85 db, it attenuates the inputs to an acceptable level.  The bigger brains than me can very likely explain it better, but I just know what works well through use.

Hope this helps.

ETA - SC-Texas types faster than me, and we are both running essentially the same gear with VHF programmed to the same freqs.

ETA2 - If you are in the area, I have two of everything if you'd like to try it out firsthand.


Where in Texas are you?  I'm in the Port Arthur/Beaumont area.  I'd love to try out your setup.


Just out of curiosity.. Do you guys use MURS frequencies or are y'all licensed HAMS and using those bands?

I have a similar setup (sorta ill post pics later) and always looking for ideas
Link Posted: 7/27/2013 5:12:24 PM EDT
[#7]
My HTs are programmed for various freqs between 145 and 167.  None of the channels are on the designated MURS freqs, and the ones on NOAA freqs are receive only.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top