Quoted: This magazine will hold 7 and 1 underneath and one in the chamber. I wish I could find out when they were made under the H&K contract.
|
Did they make the M3 before 1989 at all? I didn't think it was possible for the M3 to be preban, but I'm no Benelli guru.
I know it's possible to buy pre-89 M1s.
When I was looking Benelli was saying the collapsable stock was legal after the sunset of the ban. I wondered why no >5 round mags though. I bought this oen because it had 7+1+1.
|
The Klinton ban also affected these "evil features", so there's a source of confusion on this. Benelli has also done an about-face on their stance regarding this issue. See the tacked thread on the M4 in the shotgun armory, and follow the link to the thread on benelli's forum.
The AWB affected all shotguns, foreign or domestic. It had to be a pre-94 shotgun in order to have certain "evil features."
Now that the Klinton AWB has sunsetted, you're only affected by the '89 import ban. Domestic shotguns can have all these fun features. Imports are restricted by 922r. Folks who like foreign rifles like the FALs and the AK variants have to work within the confines of this law as well. What they have going for them is an abundance of US made parts for their rifles. That means they can stay 922 compliant by replacing a certain # (10 I think) of parts on their guns -- at that point, it's considered domestically-made, not an import.
There aren't many if any domestic parts for Benellis. No, a domestic mag extension doesn't count. The ATF actually has a list of parts which count for or against the rifle being foreign.
I've made the decision to purchase a Benelli M1 entry gun, 14" barrel, basically because they're shweet. Thankfully that means I also won't have to worry about any sort of 922 nonsense. I'm also looking to purchase an M4, and possibly register it as a SBS/AOW to get around 922r as well.
ETA: We've totally hijacked this guy's thread. It wasn't my intention to do so, I was simply responding to your comment which referenced the other thread where we started this discussion. Why don't we take this back to that other thread? I feel like I'm being rude.
ETA: Once again, genital itching.