I'll jump on the review bandwagon and tack mine on here. I'll begin by saying that I concur with
Ammoman's review.
Like everyone else, I wasn't
that scientific about it but here's my basic info:
Rifle used was a post ban Bushmaster XM15E2S (16" barrel). Shooting at 50Mwith an Aimpoint Comp M-XD sighted at 50M using Winchester Q3131A.
I fired four 5 round groups with the box Eric supplied. For comparison, I fired a like number of groups of the Winchester. Three groups of each ammo were slow fired from a sandbag to test for accuracy; the last were semi rapid fired offhand to "test for usability." All were fired under relatively calm wind conditions. I have no idea about elevation, temperature (it was hot!), humidity, etc.
Accuracy was comparable when shooting from the sandbags. If I discounted shooter error, groups averaged about 1.25" for both ammo types. The best group from the Lake City was one jagged hole (just about .75"). The offhand group from the Lake City was wider that the Winchester (3" vs. 5") but one group is hardly indicative of anything. All were comfortably inside the center of an IDPA target at 50 yards.
The Winchester's point of impact matched point of aim (as it should). The Lake City shot
slightly high. The groups centered about half of an inch above the point of aim. Not sure if this means anything or if it's more shooter error.
Muzzle flash (postban

) was more noticeable with the Lake City but not enough to be a major problem. This
might account for the (a) shooter error which, if not taken into consideration, made the Lake City groups larger and (b) the larger groups semi rapid fired off hand. Learning that it's loaded hotter makes sense.
All in all, it's awesome ammunition. I'd have to resight my scope and get used to the increased flash but for the increased energy, I think I'd suffer through that. As soon as my current stock starts looking thin and my wallet a little thicker, I forsee a purchase in the future.
Eric, thanks for giving me that chance to take part in the test!