Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Posted: 9/16/2009 4:26:03 AM EST
Check it out.
Link Posted: 9/16/2009 12:50:57 PM EST
where?
Link Posted: 9/16/2009 3:42:59 PM EST
Silencer Research.
Link Posted: 9/16/2009 4:19:09 PM EST
The TiRant ruled the roost.

Best suppression and best 1st Round Pop!

GemTech's MultiMount did pretty good also.

Link Posted: 9/16/2009 4:30:57 PM EST
New Evo 9 bests the Trident in one test, and equals it in another.
Link Posted: 9/16/2009 4:55:41 PM EST
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 7:32:30 AM EST
Originally Posted By Doc_Strangelove:
The TiRant ruled the roost.

Best suppression and best 1st Round Pop!

GemTech's MultiMount did pretty good also.



Is this information supposed to be published on a public forum? I thought that was the purpose of paying for my premium subscription.
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 9:00:10 AM EST

Originally Posted By 9mmkungfu:
Originally Posted By Doc_Strangelove:
The TiRant ruled the roost.

Best suppression and best 1st Round Pop!

GemTech's MultiMount did pretty good also.



Is this information supposed to be published on a public forum? I thought that was the purpose of paying for my premium subscription.

I was thinking it was disinformation since it was wrong.
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 12:18:39 PM EST
Just took a look at the Ti-RANT compared to the Trident.

Trident: 6.8" 7oz $720 MSRP (w/ LCD) (Also unsure of LCD weight)
Ti-Rant: 7.9" 8.6oz $1195 MSRP
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 12:29:42 PM EST
id like to know how the trident 9 somehow turned into the worst one of the bunch... something seems fishy

the numbers posted are FAR from what was posted in the 08 tests
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 1:18:09 PM EST
Originally Posted By brokefromguns:
id like to know how the trident 9 somehow turned into the worst one of the bunch... something seems fishy

the numbers posted are FAR from what was posted in the 08 tests


AAC cans have always done well with high pressure ammo, and the Trident with low pressure. There wasn't any Special K in this test.
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 2:30:36 PM EST
[Last Edit: 9/17/2009 2:34:17 PM EST by brokefromguns]
still tested 3bd higher with same ammo. oh with 6.5 db more FRP than tested before!!!!!
something still smells fishy for christs sake its reported FRP isnt even hearing safe!
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 3:13:03 PM EST
Could it be a difference in host weapons?
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 3:16:09 PM EST
What are you guys talking about?
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 3:22:49 PM EST
I wouldn't pay $1 for the crap on his website.
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 3:51:33 PM EST
Originally Posted By singtoe:
What are you guys talking about?


the discontinuity in the numbers between the old test and new test in relation to the performance of the swr trident9
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 5:19:18 PM EST
Originally Posted By wakerider017:
Just took a look at the Ti-RANT compared to the Trident.

Trident: 6.8" 7oz $720 MSRP (w/ LCD) (Also unsure of LCD weight)
Ti-Rant: 7.9" 8.6oz $1195 MSRP


I am not sure that your OAL and weight are without the mount on that...
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 5:46:22 PM EST
Originally Posted By singtoe:
What are you guys talking about?


They are talking about this:

www.silencerresearch.com
Link Posted: 9/17/2009 5:48:53 PM EST
That is with out. The SWR web site says the the can alone is 6.8" and 7oz. How much lenth and more weight does the LCD add?
Top Top