Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 2/4/2016 8:56:15 AM EDT
Does anyone have any load data for this? The bullet seems longer than other 77gr bullets (SMK) and I'm wondering how to keep it at magazine length without causing pressure issues since there is limited load data available.
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 9:26:42 AM EDT
[#1]
I'm using 23 grns. of Alliant Reloder 15, CCI 400 primers, LC cases.
Max load for this powder is listed as 24.1. I started at 22 gr w/ no problems.
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 9:38:33 AM EDT
[#2]
Thank you!

What is your COAL?

Any accurate loads for TAC or IMR4064 with this? I have tons of both.
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 10:42:31 AM EDT
[#3]
Working on an 8208-XBR load. Nice node around 21 grains that I'm exploring, and another around 23.5 or so. Using WCC brass and Wolf primers.
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 11:11:14 AM EDT
[#4]
XBR has given the best results so far. Book Max is 23.2 IIRC. A lot of people find happiness around 23.4 gr and a mild primer (Think Wolf SRM, Fed 205M, or CCI 400). Be careful and work up for your gun, it will tell you what it likes.

Load to mag length 2.25. I imagine either of the powders you listed will work. I like TAC a lot, work up to around 23.5 gr. there is usually a node somewhere between 23 and 23.5 gr where things come together.
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 1:31:19 PM EDT
[#5]
I worked up a load using lc brass, cci 450 primer, and 8208 xbr.

I started at 22.6 and went up at .1 grain intervals all the way to 23.5.   23.5 grains gave me a .60 load that has stayed in that range for approx 3-5 months now.  The chrono readings were 2650 fps.  The cases look good not beat up and no flattened primers or extractor swipes
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 5:23:45 PM EDT
[#6]
Thanks guys. I'll start with 22.0 of TAC at 2.26" and work up from there. If that doesn't work I'll look at other powders.

What is the maximum length that will fit in a magazine?
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 5:42:43 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I worked up a load using lc brass, cci 450 primer, and 8208 xbr.

I started at 22.6 and went up at .1 grain intervals all the way to 23.5.   23.5 grains gave me a .60 load that has stayed in that range for approx 3-5 months now.  The chrono readings were 2650 fps.  The cases look good not beat up and no flattened primers or extractor swipes
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I worked up a load using lc brass, cci 450 primer, and 8208 xbr.

I started at 22.6 and went up at .1 grain intervals all the way to 23.5.   23.5 grains gave me a .60 load that has stayed in that range for approx 3-5 months now.  The chrono readings were 2650 fps.  The cases look good not beat up and no flattened primers or extractor swipes

What barrel length?

I have a bunch I need to load up for my DM Course back-up and demo guns.

Quoted:
Thanks guys. I'll start with 22.0 of TAC at 2.26" and work up from there. If that doesn't work I'll look at other powders.

What is the maximum length that will fit in a magazine?


Depends on what magazine you use.  I have some little 5 or 10rd CProducts mags that wouldn't allow anything over 2.250" COL, whereas some other mags (NHMTG) will allow 2.275" with clearance to ride.

Best to start with what the chamber will allow and back off from there, taking the mag COL allowable into consideration afterwards.
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 7:25:37 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

What barrel length?

I have a bunch I need to load up for my DM Course back-up and demo guns.



Depends on what magazine you use.  I have some little 5 or 10rd CProducts mags that wouldn't allow anything over 2.250" COL, whereas some other mags (NHMTG) will allow 2.275" with clearance to ride.

Best to start with what the chamber will allow and back off from there, taking the mag COL allowable into consideration afterwards.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I worked up a load using lc brass, cci 450 primer, and 8208 xbr.

I started at 22.6 and went up at .1 grain intervals all the way to 23.5.   23.5 grains gave me a .60 load that has stayed in that range for approx 3-5 months now.  The chrono readings were 2650 fps.  The cases look good not beat up and no flattened primers or extractor swipes

What barrel length?

I have a bunch I need to load up for my DM Course back-up and demo guns.

Quoted:
Thanks guys. I'll start with 22.0 of TAC at 2.26" and work up from there. If that doesn't work I'll look at other powders.

What is the maximum length that will fit in a magazine?


Depends on what magazine you use.  I have some little 5 or 10rd CProducts mags that wouldn't allow anything over 2.250" COL, whereas some other mags (NHMTG) will allow 2.275" with clearance to ride.

Best to start with what the chamber will allow and back off from there, taking the mag COL allowable into consideration afterwards.



My chrono readings were with an 18 inch barrel
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 7:35:28 PM EDT
[#9]
Any H4895/Varget loads? I'm thinking about starting at 22gr.
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 8:09:29 PM EDT
[#10]
I'm shooting 23.0 of Varget, behind the 77TMK, with prepped LC brass, and a CCI-400 primer; I seated them at 2.25. I was getting roughly .6-.8 groups at 100 with that load, and scored 19 out of 20 hits on a 10" gong at 700 yards last weekend in 10-15mph wind.

Seems to work pretty well in my rifle.

Link Posted: 2/4/2016 9:00:05 PM EDT
[#11]
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 9:53:25 PM EDT
[#12]
I suppose I should have mentioned this is out of a 20" Krieger with a .223 Wylde chamber.

Does that make any difference on COAL, charges, etc?
Link Posted: 2/4/2016 10:25:35 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I suppose I should have mentioned this is out of a 20" Krieger with a .223 Wylde chamber.

Does that make any difference on COAL, charges, etc?
View Quote


No. Your max length is likely 2.260 unless you're single feeding rounds. Charge weight doesn't really vary *that much* by chamber.
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 2:25:22 AM EDT
[#14]
23gr Varget @ 2.25 works for me.  I think I tried another group with 23.3gr and groups opened up a bit, but I might give it another go in the spring and work up to find my max.  



Crunchy crunchy.  
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 12:20:36 PM EDT
[#15]



Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:




Any H4895/Varget loads? I'm thinking about starting at 22gr.
View Quote
LC/WCC brass
Fed 205



25g Varget (compressed)



TMK seated to 2.255"



2660
2643 fps from my 16" Mod H.  <---Edit velocity

 
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 12:46:15 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
LC/WCC brassFed 205
25g Varget (compressed)
TMK seated to 2.255"
2660 fps from my 16" Mod H.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Any H4895/Varget loads? I'm thinking about starting at 22gr.
LC/WCC brassFed 205
25g Varget (compressed)
TMK seated to 2.255"
2660 fps from my 16" Mod H.


That's freaking hot.
Link Posted: 2/5/2016 1:33:40 PM EDT
[#17]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That's freaking hot.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:

Any H4895/Varget loads? I'm thinking about starting at 22gr.
LC/WCC brassFed 205

25g Varget (compressed)

TMK seated to 2.255"

2660 fps from my 16" Mod H.





That's freaking hot.
It's warm.  I edited the velocity.  I was looking at max rather than average.  



I was testing that particular load with the TMKs.  I use that same load with the slick SMKs and get 2660 fps.  




It gives me 2347 fps (TMKs) out of my 10.5" WOA barrel.  I haven't tested the SMKs in the 10.5", but I imagine it will yield roughly the same.




Believe it or not, but I got the recipe from HP guys.  They actually use 25.3g, but use BR primers.  I have yet to find small CCI BRs locally to test with this load.  I have a theory that compressed Varget loads yield better SD/ES with the CCI BRs.  It's proven out in my 308 loads.  I'm thinking the lower burn from the BR primers gives a better overall burn for compressed Varget.  My theory at least.  I've been trying to find other guys that have run the same loads, but you know how that goes.
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 7:26:44 AM EDT
[#18]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





That's freaking hot.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

LC/WCC brassFed 205

25g Varget (compressed)

TMK seated to 2.255"

2660 fps from my 16" Mod H.



That's freaking hot.


Considering that 23.5gr H4895/24gr Varget is my max with a 75gr BTHP, agreed. I've got 22 and 22.5gr H4895 under TMKs at 2.255" I want to test later today.



 
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 9:34:55 AM EDT
[#19]


Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



I'm shooting 23.0 of Varget, behind the 77TMK, with prepped LC brass, and a CCI-400 primer; I seated them at 2.25. I was getting roughly .6-.8 groups at 100 with that load, and scored 19 out of 20 hits on a 10" gong at 700 yards last weekend in 10-15mph wind.



View Quote




<snip> Please don't post those in this forum. dryflash3
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 9:39:50 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


That's freaking hot.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Any H4895/Varget loads? I'm thinking about starting at 22gr.
LC/WCC brassFed 205
25g Varget (compressed)
TMK seated to 2.255"
2660 fps from my 16" Mod H.


That's freaking hot.


Is it?

My 69SMK load is 25.9gr of Varget, and my accurate 77SMK load was 24.5gr and zero pressure signs on either.  Mk262 Mod1 makes 2733fps (avg) from a 16" barrel.
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 8:19:29 PM EDT
[#21]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Is it?



My 69SMK load is 25.9gr of Varget, and my accurate 77SMK load was 24.5gr and zero pressure signs on either.  Mk262 Mod1 makes 2733fps (avg) from a 16" barrel.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:

Any H4895/Varget loads? I'm thinking about starting at 22gr.
LC/WCC brassFed 205

25g Varget (compressed)

TMK seated to 2.255"

2660 fps from my 16" Mod H.





That's freaking hot.




Is it?



My 69SMK load is 25.9gr of Varget, and my accurate 77SMK load was 24.5gr and zero pressure signs on either.  Mk262 Mod1 makes 2733fps (avg) from a 16" barrel.
Like I said in my last post, it's warm-simply for the fact that it's over any published load data you'll find.  I think it's just fine for me, and I agree that MK262 is way hotter.  I too got 70+ fps faster with it than my own loads.  It does beat the brass up quite a bit more that my loads too.  
Link Posted: 2/6/2016 9:46:19 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



<snip> Please don't post those in this forum. dryflash3
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm shooting 23.0 of Varget, behind the 77TMK, with prepped LC brass, and a CCI-400 primer; I seated them at 2.25. I was getting roughly .6-.8 groups at 100 with that load, and scored 19 out of 20 hits on a 10" gong at 700 yards last weekend in 10-15mph wind.



<snip> Please don't post those in this forum. dryflash3



Are you kidding me?

Show me - in ANY of the forum rules - where posting a gif image in not allowed in THIS forum?   Now - if it is posted - I'll eat my crow and apologize.

My posting a gif congratulating another member on his technical acumen for being able to reload rounds consistent enough to make 19 out of 20 hits on a 1.5 MOA target at 700 yards is ENTIRELY appropriate.

Unless of course, if there is a RULE that such things are not allowed.

Link Posted: 2/7/2016 12:08:53 AM EDT
[#23]
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 10:03:46 AM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

  Pics need to be technical in nature in a Technical Forum like this one. This is not GD.


SPECIFIC TO THE TECH FORUMS

The tech forums (Ar15,AK47,Handgun,Armory,Training,Outdoors) are more "formal" and actions permitted in the GD forum aren't permitted there. These forums are there to share information and as a result, trolling, heated arguments,insulting others,etc won't be ignored.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm shooting 23.0 of Varget, behind the 77TMK, with prepped LC brass, and a CCI-400 primer; I seated them at 2.25. I was getting roughly .6-.8 groups at 100 with that load, and scored 19 out of 20 hits on a 10" gong at 700 yards last weekend in 10-15mph wind.



<snip> Please don't post those in this forum. dryflash3



Are you kidding me?

Show me - in ANY of the forum rules - where posting a gif image in not allowed in THIS forum?   Now - if it is posted - I'll eat my crow and apologize.

My posting a gif congratulating another member on his technical acumen for being able to reload rounds consistent enough to make 19 out of 20 hits on a 1.5 MOA target at 700 yards is ENTIRELY appropriate.

Unless of course, if there is a RULE that such things are not allowed.


  Pics need to be technical in nature in a Technical Forum like this one. This is not GD.


SPECIFIC TO THE TECH FORUMS

The tech forums (Ar15,AK47,Handgun,Armory,Training,Outdoors) are more "formal" and actions permitted in the GD forum aren't permitted there. These forums are there to share information and as a result, trolling, heated arguments,insulting others,etc won't be ignored.


As I thought.  This is another made up, on the fly, undocumented rule.  There was no trolling, heated argument, or insult.  It was a compliment.  Your role is to respond to the former, not the latter.

Ok, thanks, I'll add it to my "undocumented dryflash3 made up rules only for this forum" list.  

Question:  are the board emoticons ok, like I just used?  They are images, and not technical in nature.... or are those banned as well?  
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 2:00:31 PM EDT
[#25]
Link Posted: 2/7/2016 2:00:49 PM EDT
[#26]
System Message
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top