Quoted:
This doesn't surprise me at all about the NRA, they'll sell out the .50's in order to keep things quiet on the front lines of the battle over our 2A rights. This is also another reason why I'm no longer a member of the NRA, they never stepped up back when the anti's and their buddy Slick Will rammed the AW bill through.
I just feel that the NRA doesn't want to go for the throat and would rather compromise away our gun rights. There shouldn't even be an issue when it comes to the second Amendment but as usual lawyers will find a way to argue even a comma! For the NRA to make statements such as these about the .50 is proof that they wouldn't hesitate to give them up.
I don't know who's more pathetic, the anti's for wanting to take away our Constitutional rights or the NRA for even thinking about selling out gun owners. The same gun owners that pay their bills, write letters, call....
You've managed to repeat every <untrue> cliche from the GOA talking points. What's truly pathetic is having a moderator on this site who spouts half truths and outright lies in his forum. In order:
they never stepped up back when the anti's and their buddy Slick Will rammed the AW bill through.
The NRA was deeply involved in fighting this. No lobby group can stop legislation if the votes are there to pass it. What they did do is assist in writing the <already passed as a "shell bill"> law in such a way as to give us the "post ban guns"––which really didn't ban anything (save cosmetic features), thanks to the NRA. Of course, after doing nothing, GOA and those who want to nip at the NRA's heels claimed from that the NRA "is a gun control organization." Talk about turning a huge positive into a bit of silly negative propaganda.
I just feel that the NRA doesn't want to go for the throat and would rather compromise away our gun rights.
You "just feel"––isn't that just a nice bit of logical thought?
How would the NRA "go for the throat?" Please be very specific.
Compromise is what happens when you don't have the votes to pass your agenda. That's how politics works. Refusing to compromise means losing your entire agenda––like GOA, which has accomplished NOTHING (ever).
For the NRA to make statements such as these about the .50 is proof that they wouldn't hesitate to give them up.
The NRA made no such statement––as reiterated by the OP above. Please stick to facts––it's highly unbecoming for a moderator to go off half-cocked.
I don't know who's more pathetic, the anti's for wanting to take away our Constitutional rights or the NRA for even thinking about selling out gun owners. The same gun owners that pay their bills, write letters, call....
Pathetic is using lies and half-truths to make a point. The NRA has never sold us out. Care to list where the NRA has done so? It's remarkable you talk about gun owners "that pay their bills" when you admit you aren't a member. Unbelievable! Don't worry––your betters will carry the water for you.