Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 5/18/2003 8:33:58 PM EDT
GG&G has two flip up sights available - the MAD and the A2. What do you think of them?
Link Posted: 5/18/2003 9:47:28 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/18/2003 9:54:07 PM EDT
I am considering the BUIS question myself, and realize that the ARMS unit is said to be most favored by far -- but I don't have a guess as to why. Would someone mind posting what is better about the ARMS vs. GG&G's similar unit and others? Maybe it's favored under battle or 'working' conditions, but has no advantage for target irons/plinking? Thanks for whatever more you might offer.
Link Posted: 5/18/2003 9:59:59 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Troy: I think that neither one is as good as an ARMS #40, and that the GG&G A2 is better than the MAD, and that the MAD is the only BUIS that will fit under many *conventional* scopes, so it DOES have a reason to exist. -Troy
View Quote
Troy, do you need a taller front sight post for the ARMS #40? I`m bent on using a Trijicon luminated front post, but it is of standart height.
Link Posted: 5/18/2003 10:03:32 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/18/2003 10:05:55 PM EDT
Link Posted: 5/18/2003 10:18:20 PM EDT
Originally Posted By Troy: I'm using a Trijicon front sight on a 20" A2 1:7 Bushmaster with an ARMS #40, and it works great. The slight variation in front sight base height is more pronounced on carbines, though. Still, I've never seen one that is a real problem; most folks make a bigger deal out of it than it really is. -Troy
View Quote
Thanks, Troy. I have decided to get the ARMS #40.
Link Posted: 5/18/2003 10:22:59 PM EDT
Yes, thanks for the help Troy.
Top Top