Out the gate, parts are not made by most of the suppliers, but by subcontracts to them. So it may be that the carrier and bolt where not made by the same subcontractor, or even heat treated in the same batch firings.
Next, every suppler (yes even colt) has had a improper batch of heat treated bolts. Granted that Colt tends to have a better track record when you are talking military issued parts, since not only are the parts tested by the subcontract and the supplier (them) as well, but finally batch lot inspected by the government as well (read if the government fails the lot from there sample test, the entire lot is sent back for a new replacement batch at the cost of the supplier).
So lets take this same example back to the civilian world. Granted that some bolts have been MP tested, but as stated, MP testing will not tell you if a bolt has been heat treated incorrectly, only if you have a crack in the surface of the metal alone. Here you need shear testing, and until a supplier/sub contractor does batch lot shear testing, and marks such in a way to prove that is has been done (read letter stamping a heat treated part is not the smartest way to go, and will need to laser engrave), then you have no real idea of if the heat treating was done correctly or not (read if the part is going to shatter or not down the line with a very short service life).