Quoted: bad eye relief is my #1 reason, try sitting in the back seat of a car, leaning out a door, aiming to the back of car, going 45 mph and trying to engage targets...the eotechs and aimpoints were much better then my acog NSN, couldnt imagine using something even smaller. |
LOL!!!
What action movie did you star in again? Matrix 2? Ronin? Heat?
Just pushing your buttons. All in good fun.
I know the compact ACOGs have better eye relief that the NSN. Isn't hard to do considering the NSN is 1.5". That said, there's nothing on the market that beats a holographic red dot sight for <100 yard minute of man shooting. The 1.5 ACOG's do a great job of providing the shooter with a crystal-clear-any-light-no-battery optic. Keep in mind the ACOG's work on the bindon aiming concept. That means both eyes open. If done properly the compact 1.5 ACOG can be a great optic for (in my opinion anyway) 50-100 yard shooting. Having owned a Leupold 1.5, a Compact ACOG 1.5, and tried a few others, I drew my own personal conclusion (for what little it's actually worth) that 1.5X fixed magnification is best served 50-100 yards.
I think the 1.5 ACOG is limited in it's design, but most certainly functional, and world's better than irons .... show me an optic that doesn't have a draw back. Lastly, there's no such thing as a bad ACOG.
Stacked up to an EoTech or Aimpoint, the 1.5 ACOG is disadvantaged <50 yards, but has some comparative advantages 50-100 yards. Beyond that I think there are better options such as the TA11 or TA33 or TR21R or the NF 1-4NXS or Meopta KDot or etc etc etc. Again, my opinion. Good luck! I'm sure others will chime in with different perspectives. Topics like these usually net a bunch of passionate responses!