User Panel
Posted: 9/10/2005 6:04:59 PM EDT
Thread title says it all:
|
|
DD and LaRue, IMHO. And the ARMS SIR, but I have other reasons to dislike that one.
|
|
That's what I was hoping to hear. |
|
|
Grenadier Precision ARM-R (buy through LWRC), KAC's URX, YHM FF, POF Predator.
|
|
I've got one of those already - not sure I'd mount a scope on it. To be honest, I like it so far - I really do - but I'm still not sure I'd use it for optics. |
|
|
Technically, wouldn't any FF rail be stable enough for optis mounting?
Not being a smartass, just thinking out loud. WIZZO |
|
What's your gripe with the YHM? I am curious. They're on the budget end of things as far as I can tell. I'm not fond of the whole SIR approach.
Simon |
|
No gripe. I know some don't like 'em because the threads are fine-pitched. Mine hasn't budged, though. I wish it WOULD budge....it's just a hair out of alignment - was like that when I bought it - and I'm going to have to buy the tool to remove it now that I've got an EoTech mounted; I can't mount the EoTech as far forward as I like because of the rail being misaligned. But, honestly, I have no problems with the YHM FF rail. Having said that, if it was as rugged as the others, the other guys would be out of business. |
|
|
I like the SIR 50 bi-level C as it attaches to the top rail, and barrel nut, and it doesn't require anything to be removed but the plastic handguards. It is slim line and narrowest to hold I have messerd to date. I can put rails where and when I want to, and no covers required to keep from burning hands on hot alum., which I hate. Covers just make the weapon wider and also keep heat trapped, then they also get hot.
A lot of people put risers on or use high rings, I don't have to, as the SIR's already give me a solid plaform over the receiver to attach to, and it is perfect alignment with the receiver, and I can use lower more stable rings. The gov't have chosen three hand guard systems to select from, and since KAC., ARMS, and D.D. were the ones selected as best meeting gov't needs, that where it might b a good place to start. |
|
Experience from field use shows that NO FF rails system, by itself, is a good mounting platform for optics.
Now if you bridge the receiver to the rail system, like the ARMS #38EX rails do or the SIR systems do, then it becomes more stable and trustworthy for optics. For you average square range, bench bound shooter, mounting on a DD, LaRue or KAC would probably work, but if you ever have any SHTF dreams for the rifle, I wouldn't do it. |
|
Didn't the SEALS just conclude that optics did not belong on handguards?
But they should be okay for everything else: lights and even aiming lasers, because when you are using goggles and an IR laser, that ain't PRECISION work, you're hosing down the target... |
|
<---not a SEAL. By the time *I* do something to knock a rail out of alignment, I'm in WAY over my head. |
|
|
Quoted:
Didn't the SEALS just conclude that optics did not belong on handguards? But they should be okay for everything else: lights and even aiming lasers, because when you are using goggles and an IR laser, that ain't PRECISION work, you're hosing down the target...[/quot Lazers require very reliable foundations because they are placing where a bullet is to go, not a shot gun blast. Lasers have to be out front on the hand guard, or they would be blocked by a a sling, hand, sleeve, etc. Optics are placed a varying positions, including out on the rail, all depending on the shooter, mission, and other types of equipment. If you heard someone "said" that a spec ops group like the seals made such a conclusion, you can bet there is a lot more to it than announced, if it was announced in the first place, but if so, prob. out of context. Some rail hand guards don't work well for optic's some do. If you you a wide field of view because of multible targets, then out front gives an advantage in faster target aquesition. |
|
FWIW, I've knocked two, not one, but two YHM FF rails out of alignment simply by torquing on a FVG. I would never mount optics on a FF tube. YMMV. |
||
|
Agree. YHM = bad idea for lasers and optics IMHO. C4 |
||
|
Don't forget the new VLTOR CASV-EL system. I just got them in and they are much better than the ARMS SIR IMHO. The only down side is that I cannot co-witness my EOTech on them.
C4 |
|
I have also rotated my YHM just by pushing with one hand on the VFG and one on the receiver.
Great rails with some loctite and torque....still wouldnt mount an optic on it though |
|
Here it is, any FF rail system that employ a lock ring to secure the rail to the barrel nut, those are suitable for optic mounting but..... but the chance the lock ring slipping and cause the rail to loosen and a zero shift is possible and that possibility is something no professional will want to live with. That being said, the only free float rail using this method that will work is the LaRue Rail, which has two screw that secure the lock ring and barrel nut once you get it indexed. example of this kind of system, KAC FF RAS, PRI, LaRue, Daniel Defense, and YHM
Rail system such as POF, KAC RAS2, ARMS SIR and Vltor adds a rail on top of a rail, that just screws up your mounting capabilities. RAS2 has just a hump but it also limit the way you can mount optics. Vltor is the best of the bunch, lower rail on rail height and light weight. POF having the highest rail on rial height, ARMS SIR is basically carry on a fight from a RAS era design, but I know Dick is probably got something up his sleeves with the SOPMOD2 contract... there is the continuous rail system like the LW, Troy, LMT MRP, and KAC URX2. LMT is the best of the class, the best of any class since it is a monolithic rail platform, it does not shift, nor loosen. and the continuous rail concept is the wave of the future... mount your optic anywhere on your upper rail and you will not have a problem. KAC URX2 is new and use a special tool for installation, but once it is mounted, it is solid as a rock, I would be hard pressed to see the darn thing move. another great design but the down side is the rail will require special tools for installation, not a common man do it yourself item. Troy, Samson, LW rails bolt onto the standard barrel nut, they are solid but not as solid as the URX or MRP, they have one common problem, it has to bolt to the barrel nut which some times are not exactly in spec.. you will find installing the rail to be a problem if your barrel nut are out of spec. remember mounting optic up front also adds weight, shift your weapon balance, it is cool and different looking but try to handle one of those suckers through a whole week of training, you will fast move the optic back to the center line. The advantage will not out weight the weapon balance issue. I find the optic is best on the front of the receiver give the weapon the best balance so if any... LMT MRP, URX2, Rail on rail like the SIR, Troy style system, and LaRue.... |
|
Good post Chen. C4 |
|
|
Locking onto the barrel nut may stop the rail from rotating, which is infrequent, but barrel nuts can also and do get loose once in awhile, to include from torquing vertical pistal grip use, so locking to the barrel nut is not fool proof, as Murphy is always watching
|
|
Add in the ARMS unobtanium receiver level height SIR (is that more specific than same plane ...)
So on my list KAC URXII KAC RASII KAC FF RAS AND MRE (albiet no handguard ring lock) (*I've mounted an optic with one part of the scope mount - ARMS#35 - on the reciever and the other on the SR25 RAS, no concern) ARMS SIR (all flavours) DD AR10 (locking nut) DD RAS (no handguard ring lock) Larue LMT MRP L-W MRS (if/when) HK 416 rail Grenadier is LW Piston rail. |
|
Maybe by the time I make my mind up exactly what I want, the LMT MRP will be down to a reasonable price, and I'll just go that route.....
As for the YHM rail coming loose, 1) I've tried - gonna have to buy a stupid wrench just to re-align it. 2) I don't like VFG's (I know, I know - blasphemy!)
I reserve the right to use that as a new sigline one of these days...... |
|
|
While it is an inexpensive rail system, it's fatal flaw is just that, it is prone to coming loose. Loctite will help, but God help you, should you ever want to get it off. Heat helps.......................lots of heat. |
|
|
I bought it (slightly) used. I'm gonna be pissed if it's already loctited in place. If it's not, it will be soon. No plans to do a lot of swapping on this upper - flash hider is pinned/welded anyway. |
||
|
Don't count on it, LMT invest a lot of money to make the fixtures to build the MRP, and the process is very involving. I think the price is reasonable for the amount of work involved. |
|
|
I'm trying to turn out a few low profile gas blocks and to date I've got about 20 hours in the fixture alone and it's still not making gas blocks yet. Understand that I'm a CNC newb and this is my first fixture, but just to turn out a product, which will probably take about an hour to produce, I've got 20 hours into the fixture. 99% of the people don't see this aspect. |
||
|
It was a joke, guys - I need an MRP like I need another hole in the head - it's an awesome design, but it's way beyond my needs, and I have NO problem with what it costs. As I said elsewhere in another thread, I wouldn't do business at the margins most companies have. |
|||
|
I always get a little chuckle when threads like these come up.
Let's go back to the reason why free float tubes were invented in the first place. It was found that when pressure was placed on the handguard, the barrel flexed and changed point of impact when you used a receiver mounted optic. So, the free float tube was invented so that it could take the pressure of a sling-up or a bipod, and even if it flexed, it didn't affect the barrel or the point of aim. Now, we have people wanting to put optics on the item which is going to flex, because it is only anchored at one end. As such, it is defeating the entire reason for a free float tube. By putting the optic on a free float tube, you return the situation to an inverse of the original, where the optic will now move, and the barrel will remain unmoved, when pressure is applied with a sling or bipod, or rest. Same thing with this cockamamie idea of putting front sights on the handguards. I know some people think that their FF tube is soooo good that it can't flex. Keep telling yourself that. Scopes belong on receivers. FF tubes are for taking pressure, and leaving the barrel unmoved. They are not for mounting sights. Look, I'm all for making your gun look cool. Just don't screw up the function with "cool" dress-up ideas. If your accuracy requirements are very non-demanding, then you can do anything you want, because if you aren't concerned about hitting anything smaller than a barn door, there's no need to worry about it. Sure, some are better at being rigid than others are. |
|
Just re-read my post, and it was probably a bit more harsh sounding than I really intended.
I apologize if any offense was taken from it. All I wanted to do was point out that I think the sights should be supported on a surface that is not going to move. |
|
I agree - but pushing for new designs - or exploring the limitations of existing ones - is what keeps guys like you in business, right? In all seriousness, I think that FOR MY PURPOSES (which are much lighter than the average soldier's...) a scope mounted on one of the better FF handguards would be able to hold a zero. Sure, sling tension could hurt accuracy easily, HOWEVER if one was mindful to only use the forward optics under consistent conditions - i.e. only use it with the forend rested on a sandbag or on your hand as a buffer over a harder rest, with NO sling tension, then I think you could achieve passable results in the 250-to-500-yard zone, where no-magnification optics are beginning to be useless and maybe there is no better option available. (And FWIW, I agree that many of us have way too much stuff hanging off our guns!) Specifically, i was thinking of a 2 o'clock mount for a intermediate-eye-relief scope in the 2.5-4x-6x range. True, such a setup would have limited use, but for the rare occassions when you had a partial view of a target at 300 yards and didn't want to chance a near miss with an EoTech, and no DM or SPR type rifle was available, I think it would be nice to have such an option - provided, of course, that one was aware that any odd pressure on the forend could result in a thrown shot. With the existing products out there, sure, it's not a perfect idea - but products come from ideas. Case in point: I know I can easily hit a torso at 300 yards w/ an Eotech, provided that I have a high-contrast target in good light conditions. Turn that torso 30 degrees, change lighting conditions a bit, or stand it behind a bush, and suddenly it's an impossible target to hit reliably. This is where a magnified optic could be handy, IMHO. Keep in mind - I'm referring mainly to a rifle to be used as one-gun-does-all in case of SHTF, and/or occassional use in hunting/varmint dispatching. I do NOT see dual optics as the next great thing in combat sight systems. <---NOT a tactical type guy. |
|
|
not a rail pro like the rest of you...but aren't the YHM rails weaver spec and not picatinny?
...crawls back under rock |
|
What about the TDI X6 , from TDI Arms .
I got a look at the system at a gun show last weekend . It grips the barrel nut and the FSB . I tried to flex the one they had mounted on a dummy AR , and I couldn’t flex it at all with the VFG they had mounted to it . They wanted $250 for it , with the rail covers but didn’t have any carbine length left , or I would have bought one to try . I still plan to get one , but it isn't high priority at the moment since I have other goodies pending |
|
The rail you've described is not free floating because it touches the fsb. If that doesn't matter to you, then go for it.
|
|
Reardless of if you think you it flexed or not, it did and will affect the the POI and POA even more if its touching the FSB. At 100+ yards, even a slight movement in millimeters for an optic could mean inches in movement at the POI. Which is what we are talking about. |
|
|
Best post and explanation so far in this thread. |
|
|
Get a Surefire, cheaper and better design.... for a non-free float style RAS. |
|
|
I have a Surefire already . which is why I would like to try the TDI and price really isn't an issue . |
||
|
Funny. A good FF tube won't flex. It was not made to "take pressure," but rather the shield the barrel from having to take pressure. I don't believe in mounting optics to a FF tubes, just BUIS and IR lasers. FF tubes are also lighter and stronger. They don't have many downsides. |
|
|
I would look at the MI rail LONG before I looked at the TDI rail. C4 |
|||
|
Actually my barrel would flex before my rail will. the deflection rate is so small on the rail flexing, it will still be combat accurate out to 300m with a red dot.
the way MRP, LaRue, URX are desinged, the rail can take a lot of pounding and it will stay true. flexing is very min. and you would be hard pressed to find the optic loosing zero. I have RAS with Reflex mounted up front that made good shot to 300m with me pulling on the sling to tighten my stances. of course later i remove the optic to the receiver because i find the balance to be better suited for me with the optic on the receiver. |
|
MI ???? |
|
|
www.bravocompanyusa.com/Page2.html C4 |
||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.