Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 4/9/2006 12:28:48 PM EDT
without special mounts and having enough eye relief etc...

Anyone?
Link Posted: 4/9/2006 3:43:43 PM EDT
Link Posted: 4/9/2006 4:31:59 PM EDT
just one kind, wow? thanks! anyone else want to chime in?
Link Posted: 4/9/2006 7:10:26 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 4/9/2006 7:19:41 PM EDT by 223Rem]
Ring spacing is also an issue. Considering the average rear ocular lense housing is 3" long and the flattop is only about 7", the rear rings mounts all most mid receiver. Does not leave alot of room for the front ring. You will see some rifle with the continuous rail systems (Troy, Samson) having the front ring mounted on the rail and not the receiver. There are other scopes out there with short eye relief needed for the AR15, but they do not have adequate ring spacing. As Wes points out, the MR/T was specifically designed to be mounted directly to the flattop using conventional rings.
Link Posted: 4/10/2006 4:40:23 AM EDT
Link Posted: 4/10/2006 5:12:55 AM EDT
Any scope that would work an an M16 flattop rifle will also work on a M4 Carbine (that includes the majority of rifle scopes on the market). When extended, the carbine buttstock is the same length as the rifle (same eye-relief). I highly recommend a MIL-1913 (picatinny rail) compatible scope mount, along with a matching tube diameter scope ( 1", 30mm, etc). Generally, you'll pay a lot more for a 30mm. Brownells and/or Midwayusa have serviceable, low-cost mount options.

Hotgun
Link Posted: 4/10/2006 11:34:52 PM EDT
87inches

Invisiblesoul
Link Posted: 4/11/2006 12:17:42 AM EDT
Top Top