Originally Posted By j3_:
Without going into great detail, yes I screwed the pooch in regards to the point of what the charging handle grabs on the BC when it pulls it back.
This point is mute in regards to what overall the original poster was asking, with either the resistance being the lugs not mated or if he mean a little father back, the additional tension of the hammer being cocked, and the surface tension of new parts (hammer carrier tension binding, and the carrier not moving back freely.
Having several people answered his question of possible problems, and the fact that he has not posted back, the original question has been solved, and now the after math from his problem is the guys get to have fun with me for my own mistake. I have no problem with this, and it’s actually given me a laugh/distraction that is dearly need in my life right now.
If anyone is troubled by the response posts I made to my own mistake being pointed out, or I have taken the responses to my mistake in the wrong text (as the guys pointing out that I flawed and having a enjoyment at my behalf), then I can go back and delete my responses as to not offend the masses.
As always, I apologies if I have offended anyone. Simply, with my own Karma coming back full circle in my current personal state of affairs (away from the site), I can take a back seat to the questions being asked, or stay the course of only responding with seriousness until I can regain my standard composer.
J3, I truly thank you for the reality check, and now realize that I may have been seeing the response posts to my mistake in the wrong perspective.