Brouhaha, First off please understand that I'm not being deragatory towards you or your work. So please relax.
As to your reply,
yes, you are the moderator, so you can do as you wish. I just did not think (hope) that this thread would head that way.
I never implied that my being unable to obtain new production 6.8 was your problem. My point is simply that I am not alone in this matter.
I agree with you 100%, there are often errors in articles in firearm magazines. There are certainly some writers/magazines that do a better job than others. None are perfect though, and I certainly know I've made mistakes in print in the past. That said, there are also some very hardworking credible writers out there who try very hard to get accurate data for their readers. It was two of these individuals to who I was referring.
I mentioned the 5.45 Soviet only due to the simple fact that, as far as military rifle cartridges are concerned, it is known to yaw faster than almost all of them.
As far as the 6.5mm is concerned the seemingly probable answer is simply the projectiles being tested have performed as designed. It still comes down to design.
The 'people like you' comment was meant as a compliment as people here respect you. If you really honestly think that I don't spend much of my own money and endless hours on projects trying to obtain accurate information for readers then nothing I say will probably change your mind. Respected by some hated by others, it comes with my profession. Yes, I DO get paid for my work. I made the decision to make this a career, and it's what I do full time. If it makes me a lessor person in your eyes, then so be it.
My whole point was simply that you are respected here by many, so it would be of value if you set the entire 6.8 cartridge to the side and considered the 6.5 on its own merits, and let the chips fall where they may.
That was it, I apolagize if I offended you.
best regards,
David M. Fortier