Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
12/6/2019 7:27:02 PM
Posted: 12/1/2013 6:51:52 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/12/2013 8:19:42 AM EST by shadowcop]
My favorite Taccom build.
7" Taccom barrel
Taccom .22 LR upper receiver
Taccom .22 BCG
Hakko Multi dot Optic
M.I. Gen ll SS 9" Free float


Link Posted: 12/1/2013 8:15:38 AM EST
I'm liking the way you filled in the logo.......what did you do it with?

Nice set up!!
Link Posted: 12/1/2013 8:18:18 AM EST
Where did the upper receiver come from? I thought Taccom was using DPMS low pro upper receivers. Would love to buy this for my 22LR SBR build.
Link Posted: 12/1/2013 1:48:01 PM EST
That receiver is awesome, is taccom making smaller ejection port holes, or is it the picture? I am doing a pistol build with suppressor, and think a smaller ejection port would be more quiet.
Link Posted: 12/1/2013 4:29:52 PM EST
[Last Edit: 12/1/2013 4:31:14 PM EST by shadowcop]
Tim, the fill was done with Lacquer pins. Sort of like a lacquer crayon.

These are the new Taccom upper receivers.
Taccom milled off the forward assist and reduced the size of the ejection port for .22. It covers more of the bcg.
No ejection port cover.
Very slick!

Dave N
Link Posted: 12/1/2013 7:19:25 PM EST
I was going to email Tim. But I will ask here. When will the be on the website for sale?

MAHA
Link Posted: 12/2/2013 10:30:27 AM EST
What kind of accuracy you get with that barrel by chance?
Link Posted: 12/2/2013 11:38:35 AM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 556hollowtip:
What kind of accuracy you get with that barrel by chance?
View Quote


Along with this, are you planning on using this as a suppressor host?

I have read that the 4.5 inch barrel will keep .22 bulk subsonic, which is a huge advantage. If this barrel would do almost the same, I would definitely prefer it to the 4.5 inch model.

Thanks
Link Posted: 12/2/2013 1:07:49 PM EST
Awesome Build Dave N.
Sweet Upper Receiver Tim...


Dave S
Link Posted: 12/2/2013 2:10:26 PM EST
[Last Edit: 12/12/2013 8:20:09 AM EST by shadowcop]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By explainyourface:


Along with this, are you planning on using this as a suppressor host?

I have read that the 4.5 inch barrel will keep .22 bulk subsonic, which is a huge advantage. If this barrel would do almost the same, I would definitely prefer it to the 4.5 inch model.

Thanks
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By explainyourface:
Originally Posted By 556hollowtip:
What kind of accuracy you get with that barrel by chance?


Along with this, are you planning on using this as a suppressor host?

I have read that the 4.5 inch barrel will keep .22 bulk subsonic, which is a huge advantage. If this barrel would do almost the same, I would definitely prefer it to the 4.5 inch model.

Thanks


7" will not keep high velocity ammo sub sonic.
I use standard velocity ammo for quiet with the can.

I've only shot the barrel at 25 yards. Average was .5-.7 with CCI standard.

Thanks Dave S. The upper receiver is awesome.

Dave N
Link Posted: 12/2/2013 2:54:26 PM EST
Got it... I have a good stash of CCI SV. You are indeed inferring that it stays subsonic in this barrel, correct?

I can save the wally world bulk packs for the M&P 22 if that is the case!

Thanks
Link Posted: 12/2/2013 3:41:03 PM EST
I hope to get out to the Range this weekened. I have a 4" and 7" TACCOM barrel on SBR Lowers. I will do some shooting for groups and post back.

MAHA
Link Posted: 12/2/2013 4:00:09 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By explainyourface:
Got it... I have a good stash of CCI SV. You are indeed inferring that it stays subsonic in this barrel, correct?

I can save the wally world bulk packs for the M&P 22 if that is the case!

Thanks
View Quote


Yes, they stay sub sonic in mine. Also have pretty decent accuracy.
Dave N
Link Posted: 12/8/2013 7:27:10 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mahamotorworks:
I hope to get out to the Range this weekened. I have a 4" and 7" TACCOM barrel on SBR Lowers. I will do some shooting for groups and post back.

MAHA
View Quote


Any update with accuracy tests??
Link Posted: 12/9/2013 5:14:21 AM EST
That is a damn sexy .22.

Thanks for deciding my next needless build.
Link Posted: 12/9/2013 9:04:34 PM EST
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By explainyourface:

Any update with accuracy tests??
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By explainyourface:
Originally Posted By Mahamotorworks:
I hope to get out to the Range this weekened. I have a 4" and 7" TACCOM barrel on SBR Lowers. I will do some shooting for groups and post back.
MAHA

Any update with accuracy tests??


Got busy and didnt make it out. Holding to make it this week.

MAHA
Link Posted: 12/12/2013 8:03:56 AM EST
Originally Posted By shadowcop:
My favorite Taccom build.
7.5" Taccom barrel
Taccom .22 LR upper receiver
Taccom .22 BCG
Hakko Multi dot Optic
M.I. Gen ll SS 9" Free float

http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/Taccom_7_5_pistol_004.JPG
http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/medium/Taccom_7_5_pistol_002.JPG
View Quote


What length FH are you using? The barrel only appears to be 1/2 of the 9" handguard.

A 7.5" barrel in a 9" HG should be about flush, no? It looks like a 4.5" with a 5" FH.
Link Posted: 12/12/2013 8:19:15 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/12/2013 2:10:39 PM EST by shadowcop]
5.5" CAR type FH.
It's a 7" Taccom barrel.
Dave N
Link Posted: 12/12/2013 8:49:40 AM EST
Beautiful build.

Just placed my order to replicate your build. Very friendly people to do business with.

What I didn't know was that the pressure plug was included in the upper package. So that was a pleasant surprise.
Link Posted: 12/12/2013 2:09:04 PM EST
[Last Edit: 12/12/2013 2:09:54 PM EST by shadowcop]
Crappy pic but here is the barrel and FH without the hand guard.
Different upper receiver taken before the Taccom upper receiver.

Top Top