Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 8/17/2005 4:14:56 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/19/2005 5:59:13 AM EDT by Swillis]
Anyone have pistures of the difference in lighting they both put out 125/225 lumens why go with one over the other is one more of a concentrated the other more scattered ....if anyone has picts of the illumination that would be a big help thanks

I'll be purchasing 2 lights from BrightFlashlights verry soon let you know how it turns out turbo head for the ar and the regular with the strike bezel for duty light
Link Posted: 8/17/2005 7:41:07 AM EDT
Turbo head has longer reach.

I'll try to do some pics when I get my camera back from the shop
Link Posted: 8/17/2005 8:45:05 AM EDT
This is the MN11 (225Lumen/20min) in the "M3" bezel:

This is the MN16 (225Lumen/20min) in the "M3T" (TurboHead) bezel:

The difference the TurboHead makes is an obvious and significant increase in beam intensity/throw.

Well worth it in my opinion.
Link Posted: 8/17/2005 4:12:37 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/17/2005 4:33:05 PM EDT
I would think that a wider beam would be more usefull indoors than a turbohead. The light will "spill" and illuminate more of a room than a tightly focused beam. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Link Posted: 8/17/2005 8:15:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/17/2005 8:16:20 PM EDT by tth110]
Different bezel sizes for different applications. There isn't one better than the other. Pick the right one for your application. Use it wrong, then you'll see the disadvantage.

I still prefered the 2.5 in bezel for longer reach. After all, an indoor distance of 20 yards (unless you live in a castle) will not bring out the difference in both bezels.
Link Posted: 8/19/2005 4:25:03 AM EDT
thanks guys thats a lot of help ordering my light soon
Top Top