Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 9/17/2004 6:01:14 PM EST
now I know some of you guys love your stubby stocks, but now that the AWB is gone can anyone find a reason to have a Stubby stock instead of a collapsible one?
Link Posted: 9/17/2004 6:12:56 PM EST
Three reasons for sure:
New York
New Jersey
California

and I think Massachusetts, Connecticut and Hawaii.
Link Posted: 9/17/2004 6:14:45 PM EST
If you live in a free state they should be a thing of the past.
Link Posted: 9/17/2004 6:27:14 PM EST
Some folks like them.....I personally prefer a collapsing, but when I build a varmiter it will have a straight stock.
Link Posted: 9/17/2004 6:31:39 PM EST
Eh, we can use em in CT


I picked one up for giggles... couldn't pass it up for $30


- BG
Link Posted: 9/17/2004 6:31:48 PM EST
yes
Link Posted: 9/17/2004 6:43:40 PM EST
You guys ever heard of the Sully stock?
Link Posted: 9/18/2004 4:56:36 PM EST
I could install a folding stock on my AR but I'm keeping a Sully stock on my 16" AR. The Sully stock works very well with the more squared off stance taught by Pat Rogers and others, and it's still long enough to be useful in the prone. It's solid and helps the balance of the weapon, doesn't have any protruding edges, and works very well with a single point sling.
Link Posted: 9/18/2004 5:00:07 PM EST
Originally Posted By Vinnie:
Three reasons for sure:
New York
New Jersey
California
quote]

Why California? You can have collapsables on "post-ban" AR's so long as they were registered before 2000. If they're not registered, they're illegal with or without a collapsable stock...
Link Posted: 9/18/2004 5:33:18 PM EST
I guess the fact that they don't rattle might keep them alive in the free states...
Link Posted: 9/18/2004 5:35:30 PM EST

Originally Posted By Va_Dinger:
You guys ever heard of the Sully stock?




Comes in OD Green now too!!!
Top Top