Quoted:
Quoted: after the ban expires, buy a used one to shoot. Keep that one new as an investment. If another ban passes next year, it will appreciate in value.
|
While we are being pessimistic, maybe the next ban has a no grandfather/no transfer clause.....................
|
This is true. However...that would mean the gubmint would have a mandatory turn-in and/or have to come and remove each banned firearm by force from the homes of Americans. This did not happen in 1986 with the NFA, it did not happen in 1989 with the imported AW ban, it did not happen in 1994 with the AWB that is about to expire. Grandfathering and/or registration with any new ban is far more likely. While Australia did mandate a compulsory gun buyback program, it was extremely unpopular, I doubt very seriously that would ever fly here, unless Diane Feinstein & all her friends controlled the Whitehouse, Congress and Senate. I do see the likely possibility of a ban on rifles and pistols with any military features whatsoever(no pistol grip this time), with limited capacity magazines, perhaps even non-detachable only, as in Kalifornia, this time around, if the Dems win the election and maintain a majority in one of the two houses. Many republican lawmakers are going south on us.
I would say any new ban will allow grandfathering of existing weapons, with or without registration. Of course, if they permit grandfathering, but restrict or ban sale of semi-auto replacement parts, then eventually semi-autos would be relegated to safes and museums and not the firing range where the public is concerned. An unlikely, if possible scenario.
Of course it is all conjecture at this point. Let's hope for the best, and be vocal with our legislators.