Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
10/20/2017 1:01:18 AM
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 8/12/2005 12:56:34 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/12/2005 1:03:37 PM EDT by AKGURU]
Link Posted: 8/12/2005 1:01:17 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/12/2005 1:03:56 PM EDT
Mainly just for punching paper out to 200yds.
Link Posted: 8/12/2005 1:09:01 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/12/2005 6:17:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/12/2005 6:37:55 PM EDT by CSGunWorkscom]
Link Posted: 8/12/2005 6:53:45 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/12/2005 7:10:04 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/12/2005 7:18:13 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/12/2005 7:19:17 PM EDT by CSGunWorkscom]
Link Posted: 8/12/2005 8:16:21 PM EDT
I had both the M1 and M2. The glass is very nice, I have to say that. The eye relief on the .223 model is adequate...there could be more, but even with glasses, I could shoot without any trouble. The .308 version is just too short, imho.

The IOR are big and clunky, but they appear to be built like a tank.

Leatherwoods don't have a very good rep around here, but I have no personal experience.

For $300, though, there are some good scopes out there. You could get a Leupold 1x4 for less than $200 that would be better than the Leathwood, I'm pretty sure. I can tell you without a doubt that a Weaver Grand Slam would blow that Leatherwood away, and cost less than what BM wants for the Leatherwood.

You could try a Bushnell 3200 Elite 3x9 in that price range as well.

Like I said, for $300, there are some good choices.

Top Top