User Panel
Dammit! The only bad thing is you didn't order me one...
Thanks for the reveiw! |
|
Looks like another winner from Trijicon!
BTW, how much was it? |
|
I paid $850 for the ACOG/Larue combo. The service from BigDawg was supreme.
I'm trying to get a reticule picture now....that's hard to do! |
|
Hokie, after that review, do you know how hard it is for me to not go put one on one of my own rifles? I keep looking around the house for gear I'm not using to sell so I can get one. My wife made me promise when I started the business that I wouldn't buy any of my own products until we started turning a decent profit or at least broke even on our initial investent unless I sold something I already owned.
I've got to tell you guys, it is HARD being surrounded with all this nice gear and not putting it on my own rifles. At least my wife bought me a LaRue SPR mount for my birthday for one of my high powered Leupold scopes. I'm just glad she bought it from me. |
|
Truth is, I'm a little suprised you sold it to me! This is why I could probably never start a business within the firearms industry! lol.... |
|
I have owned a 1.5x and 3x compact ACOG. They were nice but I always wished they had the BDC reticle on the TA31 series. Plus they both had amber reticules which I never learned to like. Both my TA31s have the Precision Reflex covers. Nice that this compact ACOG can use regular Butler Creek covers. I think I need to try one out. Maybe I'll sell my Tripower to help fund this.
|
|
Howdy Hokie!
I'm curious how, as you say "the smaller FOV (19.3 at 100) makes the BAC real easy to use." Why is that? Does that mean the chevron fills more of your sight picture? |
|
Sorta...in moving side to side on multiple targets with both eyes open, the smaller FOV (for me) makes the target 'appear' directly in front of the chevron as there's less space in the sight picture and that seems to make it easier (faster) to center the target with the ACOG. At first I thought it was the 3X magnification that made it easier to adjust my right eye. However after a few shots (I set up two targets 30 feet apart) I noticed it's the smaller FOV in addition to the 3X that makes the target 'appear' right away in front of the chevron. It's hard to explain and I might not be doing the best job at explaining the BAC...but the smaller FOV definately speeds up the target acquisition. With regards to the BAC, I think the overall small diameter of the ACOG keeps the surrounding area easy to move over using your left eye, thus making the quick switch focus that much easier. The small FOV, overall compactness of the scope, the generous eye relief, and 3X aid in that. So you're right, but I think it's a few factors contributing to what I'm calling a distinct advantage with the TA33R8 ACOG. If I spoke in circles please forgive me. I'm not the best technical writer! To expand on this, from the perspective of a right handed person, the TA33R8 gives the shooter's left eye a little more control than other ACOG models do. This in addition the features highlighted above, make for a fast optic as it (again, IMHO) gives the shooter a better balance in switching your focus while employing the bindon aiming concept. To bottom line it - this ACOG is a TA11F - only smaller, lighter, and less expensive! At only 1X less than a TA31, I think the overall value of this ACOG is second to none. Definately a prime example of ACOG evolution! |
|
|
Did you ever buy a TA11? ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=18&t=309840
|
|
Had a TA11D in 2002, sold it. In my then green-view of the AR scene - I had the scope on a carry handle and hated it. I liked the eye relief but didn't like the bulk atop a 16" CAR. Recently, I was looking for a TA11F to mount to a different 16" middy of mine, with a FSB. I was all set on buying one (hence that ad) until I stumbled upon the TA33. The TA11 is still awesome, but I think the TA33 trumps it on almost every level. Only advantage of the TA11 has now is 0.5X more magnification. |
|
|
Wow--great sight picture photo. For the less informed among us, can you give us some more details of your upper configuration? |
|
|
No problem: 16" GTS Recon Barrel (1:7 twist, mid-length, chrome-lined, stainless, .740 profile to the gas block - .750 thereafter, matching bolt, wylde chamber) *best barrel I've ever owned anyway YHM Phantom 5C2 PRI lo-pro gas block Daniel Defense 12.0 w/ Magpul ladders Bushmaster upper/lower Troy front & rear BUIS PRI gas buster charging handle |
||
|
Specs on the TA33R8:
Magnification: 3X Objective lens: 30mm Eye Relief: 1.9 (TA11 is 2.4, TA31 is 1.5) Exit Pupil: 10mm FOV (degrees): 3.7 Length: 6.1" (TA11 is 8.0, TA31 is 5.8) Weight: 6.94oz (TA11 is 14.0, TA31 is 9.9) FOV (feet): 19.3 at 100 yards (TA11 is 28.9, TA31 is 36.8) Adjustments: 4 clicks/inch at 100 yards |
|
Awesome setup. I *thought* that looked like Denny's RECON barrel in a matte-blasted finish. So the chrome-lined SS is the latest variant, right? What kind of "shooting for accuracy" groups do you get with that beast? |
|
|
Thanks! Not sure about latest variants, but I've always known Denny's bbl to have all those features. Using a Leupold 1.5X5 MR/T I was getting 1/2" groups at 100 yards without much effort on my part. The barrel is better than I'll ever be. I'm sure this ACOG will allow me to hit those 1/2" groups too - we'll see this weekend. |
||
|
IIRC, he had the RECON barrel in SS-only at first, and then fairly recently added the chrome-lined option...or was that the Noveske barrels I'm thinking of? Now it's getting muddy. Wow--"without much effort" says alot about the setup, or a lot about your modesty. What ammo did you use to get the 1/2" groups? |
|
|
I always use the good stuff. Usually a 5.56 75 or 77 grain match bullet or TAP load. Though I've also tried 69 Federal ammo with great success. Not so much though when I shoot 62 grain SS109. Usually it takes all I have to get 1MOA. Using 55 grain ammo (typically Winchester white box or M193 or S&B) my groups bloom to 1.5 - 2". I only use a bipod when shooting. I think those firm benchrests allow too much cheatin' for a SHTF gun like the AR15! If I had a Varminter or something similar that'd be different. |
||
|
I was going to say, that pic looks like quite the optical illusion: "where's the rest of the house!" The "shed" completely fills up the FOV through the ACOG and you cannot see anything peeking out on the sides of the optic. Do you have a pic of the shed from the same vantage not looking through an optic? |
|
|
BTW, is there much of a shadow through the TA33 with the Troy flipped up? I'm curious how this 3X would work with a fixed FSB...
|
|
I'd have to take one, but it's there, I promise! You don't get a 'real' world view when taking a photo like that, as you'd have to (like you said) see a vantage point from the same angle w/o the ACOG. |
||
|
Yes, you'd have to have the flip up or the chevron goes through the top of the tower, below the sight post. It's blurry enough to be a PITA. I think it's a combo of the short elevation of the ACOG, and the lower magnification. I'd recommend the flip ups. |
|
|
Hey!, what's all that white-colored shit on your deck - fallout? I've never seen that stuff before.
|
|
It's called "Wintah" In Maine - if the snow's meltin' ... it's warm out! Everything else is considered normal! |
|
|
Isn't that due to the height of the LaRue mount? The best I can tell from pics alone is that there may be additional height built into the mount that ships with the TA33 (see here) that may not be present in the LaRue LT105 (see here). |
||
|
I just checked. The TA60 is 1/2" above the rail. The Larue is approximately 3/8". With both, it's my observation that the post is still blurry enough in the lower half of the ACOG's sight picture to annoy you. I'd still recommend the Larue mount and a flip up BUIS. If you're retrofitting an ACOG to a rifle, middy, or carbine you might be better served with an ACOG of 3.5X magnification or higher. Seems that the 3X still allows the sight tower to be black enough (though blurry) to obstruct a decent sight picture. |
|||
|
Wintah! LOL! What's wintah? 70 degrees today, clear and sunny. |
|
|
|
It'd be most supreme for fast & accurate 10-200 yard bad guy shooting. Since it then drops to the BDC, your range is duely extended to 600 yards. If most of you're shooting is 200 yards or under, where most combat situations are likely to happen - then yes - this ACOG is truly the cat's ass.
Damn I love this ACOG. I haven't played with the BDC yet, but I look forward to it. If I get a chance I want to call Trijicon to get some tech info on the BDC calibration. |
|
I'm trying to get more of the TA33R-8 ACOG's in. I should know something first of next week when to expect them. |
|
|
Sorry If I missed it but what lenth of barell is it calibrated for?
|
|
I'm gonna call Trijicon and post the info here. |
|
|
From Trijicon....
The TA33R8 is calibrated using a 14.5" 1:7 carbine barrel. The ammo used is M855 out to 600m. I'm told using a 16" barrel and heavier 75gr ammo would yield similar results. |
|
Is that mounted on the carry handle or on a flat top?
Also, could I kindly request a more close up pic of the reticle? |
|
Innnnteresting My Sabre midlength and 75gr TAP might light this scope. |
|
|
It just might! Seems my GTS middy is gonna enjoy my stash of 75 TAP as well! |
||
|
I'll do my best homey...but I'll be honest, if someone has tips on photographing ACOG reticules - I'm all ears. I suck at it. But I'll give it my best shot if time permits this weekend. |
|
|
Looking at this combo in the ballistics program for using 75gr BHBB: I'd zero the rifle with the little ACOG and 75gr BH at about 1" high at 100 yards, which would give you: About 1" high at 200 yards .6" high at 250 dead on at 300 .8" low at 350 1.1" low at 400 2.8" low at 400, 4.5" low at 500 5.3" low at 550 6.3" low at 600 This is of course an approximation depending on muzzle velocities and the like out of your rifle, but it's probably a pretty good start. It sure as heck looks good on your rifle, Hokie. |
|
|
My question is relative to the mount. How does the scoipe attach to that LaRue mount? It looks like the scope base is inside the mount. It also looks like there is a relatively straight tongue that comes down off the scope and goes into the mount. Tell me more about this arrangement.
|
|
Great info Edwin, thanks! That's a great start actually. I centered the ACOG initially using the tip to hit dead nuts at 100yards, but 1" high would be interesting. I can touch 200 yards at my range, but anything beyond that requires me to head an hour north to some open territory. I'll do that though - soon! |
||
|
Forgot to mention that part, sorry. The ACOG is calibrated using the TA60 flattop mount. I'd imagine the Larue's 1/8" reduced height over the bore would be negligible re: the BDC. I don't know for certain but I won't lose a bit of sleep over it either. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.