Personally I would go with either the ARMS or the Warne.
Time for a story? I have a Springfield 6.5-20x scope on my M15-A4 (T) held in Warne Ultra High QD rings. The rifle was sighted in at 500 yards. When I was working up loads for the .458 SOCOM I wanted some magnification a bit better than the EOTech and decided to use the Springfield. To zero to 100 I put in 11.25 MOA down in the scope. I took the scope off and it went right on the DPMS Lo-Pro upper without having to move the rings. With a few clicks up and over it was sighted in with the .458 SOCOM and I did the load work up. After I was done, I "undid" the clicks put in to zero the .458 SOCOM and put back in the 11.25 MOA elevation and remounted the scope on the M15. With my strike mark at 11.25" above the aiming point, my fist shot was dead center where it was supposed to be. OK, zeroed for 500 AT 100, but is it still really zeroed at 500? Back at the 500 yard line I shot a 5 shot group. Of course I could not see where I hit even through the spotting scope so back to the impact area to check results. Dead on. The scope and rings went right back to zero after all that buggering around. Just one more reason I am sold on Warne rings. I've used them for years on many different guns, but this was the most severe test yet and they passed, as did the scope, with flying colors.