For the longest time scopes in the US were found with mil dot (or Mil-based) reticles and MOA turrets. Why, who knows. The rest of the world was using matching systems which require no math to translate what the reticle reads to the turrets.
More on that here. Most optics companies are moving to Mil/Mil systems now. Of all the major optics players for the US market Nikon is really the only one left that doesn't offer a mil/mil scope. Leupold does offer them but only in select models.
Some people will say its not a big deal but why make it harder than it has to be. I myself will never buy another scope that doesn't match. There's no point in going backwards.
Leupold MRT Pros:
Lightweight
Good warranty/cust service
Pretty good glass
Cons:
Small magnification range
Mismatched turrets
Illumination not standard
Nightforce Pros:
Available in mil/mil or moa/moa
More reticle options
Illumination standard
NF rep for being bulletproof
NF rep for unbeatable return to zero and tracking
Available with Zero Stop
Better glass
More magnification range
Good warranty & CS
Cons:
More expensive
Little heavier
Might be a little harder to locate one in stock