Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 6/5/2003 7:08:55 AM EDT
I was wondering which one of these mounts is better to mount an AimpointCompM2 as far as being able to take the moint on and off and get repeatable zero. Both Aimpoint and ARMS say they will remain zeroed, but I know from experience with other mounts that claim the same thing, it isn't alway so. If anybody has any experiences good or bad with these mounts, please let me know.
Link Posted: 6/5/2003 7:17:11 AM EDT
Aimpoint is good and it holds it zero but ARMS #22M68 is far better IMHO. Buy one you won´t regret. MN
Link Posted: 6/5/2003 7:45:00 AM EDT
Definetly get the 22m68 the aimpoint is good but the arms will definetly retain zero
Link Posted: 6/5/2003 8:14:38 AM EDT
I absolutely agree with the two gentlemen's opinion on the ARMS mount. you just can't go wrong with a throw lever mount from ARMS. Look into the cantilever spcaer option for this mount, it is very well design and very cool.
Link Posted: 6/5/2003 8:25:54 AM EDT
Virtualy all rings retain/maintain zero, the question is what repeats zero best, and that is what the throw levers do. 22M68 is the best like the other ones ARMS makes for repeat on off. Good shootin, Jack
Link Posted: 6/5/2003 11:23:56 AM EDT
Okay, it sounds like the ARMS is the better of the two, so which spacer would one use get the correct hight for cowitnessing ARMS#40 on a Bushmaster flattop?
Link Posted: 6/5/2003 11:38:18 AM EDT
If you wher going directly on the flat top you want a full spacer
Link Posted: 6/5/2003 12:08:20 PM EDT
Originally Posted By thirddegree: If you wher going directly on the flat top you want a full spacer
View Quote
Or the new cantilever spacer.
Link Posted: 6/5/2003 12:15:49 PM EDT
i forgot about that
Top Top