I have two Sig 556's and several AR's. As some wierdo I talked to on the phone the other day said, its very much a "peaches to billy goat" comparison.
While I fully support op-rod technology, I find myself to be very "anti gas-piston" AR.
Like H&K's roller locking system, the AR's DI system isn't perfect in every technical way, but you can't argue with its performance. Sure its dirty/hot, but its also simple/accurate/reliable. A civilian running a semi-auto, non suppressed, non SBR will never have a "need" for a gas-piston AR IMO.Whatever gains you might make in terms of cleanliness are offset by price and dubious long-term performance. The performance and logevity of DI AR's is well known, the same isn't true of gas-piston conversions. For a non suppressed, non SBR semi-auto there is no appreciable performance gain with a gas-piston. Some advertise "simplified maitnance". While this may be true, its at the expense of a more complex operating system... These peoples add campaigns have been so successful people really think AR's jam when they are dirty.
Buy a good quality AR that uses quality components and keep it lubed up and you will have one of the most reliable/proven 5.56 weapons availible.
With that being said, I really like my Sig 556's. However, I have yet to find a rifle with better controls/ergonomics than the AR carbine. Reliability and accuracy are excellent. Personally, I think the Sig 556 is better than your average Bushmaster/DPMS/Armalite/whatever AR carbine and the rough eqivalent to the higher end carbines such as Colt/LMT/Noveske. I certainly won't say its "better" but for a civilian rifle, its probably similar/comperable....
To me, a serious fighting rifle will always probably be an AR carbine of some stripe. The Sig 556 is a cool gun that I really like and would comfortably use if I didn't have a Colt/LMT/KAC.
All in all, the Sig 556 is an excellent choice for a gas-piston 5.56 carbine. Probably more so than a converted AR...