Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 5/11/2004 4:51:11 PM EST
[Last Edit: 5/11/2004 4:51:35 PM EST by bigbore]
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:00:50 PM EST
SWEET! Looks like an SPR without all the bells and whistles. Plain, simple, VERY effective!! Almost wish I had seen that arrangement before I pursued my full blown SPR build!!

Let me know when you guys need people to shoot all those guns you are building. I'm just a phone call away.
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:29:52 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:32:51 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 6:42:44 PM EST
I really really need one of those MR/T M3's......
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 7:02:25 PM EST
One word comes to mind..... awesome.
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 7:04:23 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/11/2004 10:39:04 PM EST
Do you sell the SPR grips?
Link Posted: 5/12/2004 1:42:36 AM EST
Very nice - simple and effective
Link Posted: 5/12/2004 5:53:10 PM EST
Funny, having seen so many 18" SPR barrels lately, this 20" one looks downright odd. Kinda like a 24" used to before there was an 18". Very cool though. Quite functional.
Link Posted: 5/12/2004 7:02:50 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 5:59:00 AM EST
Is that an A1 or an A2 Vltor? Also, what is the weight of that minus optics, or even with optics?
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 7:09:33 AM EST
Two words come to mind: BLACK EYE !

For me, that scope is going to have to be moved forward. It's already hanging off behind the charging handle, Add another 3" or more for proper eye relief from a good quality Leupold scope and that thing will be useless in the prone position.

I'd move the rear ring to about the current position of the fron ring. This would place the front ring over the handguard. This is why the ARMS S-EX was invented. If the front rails line up with the flat opt you could bridge across but I wiuldn't trust it, too many opportunities for a problem.

Time for a re-do.
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 10:56:51 AM EST
The scope would be better off pushed forward a bit, but the receiver is too short, and the scope is so low it will be awkward for most shooters. A sleeve would also be very advisable if using a ring that tightens with a wrench, because you end up chrushing the alum. with the littls steel clamps. I have seen so many receivers with big dents in them, they had to be replaced. At least with a sleeve, the receiver isn't going to be damaged from a steel ring. You can always replace a sleeve if/when damaged. A dented rail is no fun to use if you want repeat on and off. The Military SPR issue sniper rifles don't mount so low for good reasons.
Jack
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 3:48:20 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 4:38:32 PM EST
[Last Edit: 5/13/2004 4:39:10 PM EST by Mike_Mills]
Oh, okay. You understand my point and had already dealt with it. Personally, I need a LOT of room as I am very tall. Service rifles, all of them, do not fit me except for the US Model 1917and the 03 Springfield (barely).

I forgot to say, it is a fine looking rifle.
Link Posted: 5/13/2004 4:46:44 PM EST
Link Posted: 5/14/2004 9:52:04 AM EST
[Last Edit: 5/14/2004 10:03:25 AM EST by mongo001]
Please excuse my ignorance on this, but is the same barrel used on DCM type uppers. Thanks.


Originally Posted By bigbore:


Bigbore, is that the SAM profile barrel? Nice looking rifle!



Actually, yes. The SAM barrel is just a NM service rifle barrel.....

Link Posted: 5/14/2004 10:09:40 AM EST
Top Top