Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 9/18/2005 8:58:00 PM EDT
Anyone have experiences with either one of these on their ARs?

Using a tactical FF rail system with front flips, I would think that the inline versions would be more ideal for that application...even for side mounting.

Comments are welcome.

Link Posted: 9/19/2005 4:42:57 AM EDT
Link Posted: 9/19/2005 2:01:14 PM EDT

Originally Posted By C4iGrant:

Originally Posted By Mthr1:
Anyone have experiences with either one of these on their ARs?

Using a tactical FF rail system with front flips, I would think that the inline versions would be more ideal for that application...even for side mounting.

Comments are welcome.




I run and prefer the OTAL. Lasers that are used for aiming usually go on the 12 position. Lasers that are used for designation are on the 3 or 9 positions.


C4

www.GRTactical.com



www.gandrtactical.com/images/archive/Grant's%20weapons/Grant's%20M4.JPG

www.gandrtactical.com/images/archive/LD%20OTAL%201913c.jpg




Interesting points about mounting. Since the OTAL is an offset laser, when used for aiming, what distance are you sighting the laser in at? I guess my mentality was for an inline laser, sighting it parrallel to the barrel and just figuring point of impact would always be X" from the laser (in a direction that would be appropriate to what side the laser was mounted on).

I do, however, do like the OTAL. I'll keep you in mind when it comes time to shop.

Thanks.

Link Posted: 9/19/2005 2:37:47 PM EDT
Top Top