Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 10/26/2013 8:28:49 AM EST
I have purchased a KAC SR-15E3 IWS LPR and Leupold VX•R Patrol 1.25-4x20mm (30mm).

I have decided that Larue Tactical is going to be the source for my scope mount. I'm also going to choose the VFZ™ mount option (not a cost issue). I started looking at the Warne R.A.M.P. and Burris P.E.P.R. mounts first, but decided against them for various reasons.

I'm trying to decide between the LT807 and LT104. Is there a reason that I can't span the receiver and the free-floating, continuous top rail system if I need to move the scope forward using the LT807 mount? If it is was a monolithic upper, I know wouldn't have to ask.

My desire is to have to scope at iron sights height (about 1.4"). I currently have Warne Maxima Magnum AR-15 Flat Top Rings (30mm, Steel, QD, Ultra High, Matte Black - 217LM) on my AR-10 that has a 50mm objective scope.

Your thoughts please. Thanks.
Link Posted: 10/26/2013 8:44:15 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/26/2013 8:44:26 AM EST by 9divdoc]
LT 104 I would not want to bridge the optic do to possible rotation of the forearm
Link Posted: 10/26/2013 10:28:39 AM EST
If you're worried about the 1.375" height of the LT807 vs the 1.5" height of the LT104, don't be - the 104 is just perfect in my opinion and there's no reason to get the 807 for your setup.

Get the LT104 and don't look back.
Link Posted: 10/27/2013 9:43:16 AM EST
Thanks guys! A recommendation and a second...and no ones disgrees. Sounds like I have my answer.
Link Posted: 10/28/2013 6:39:03 PM EST
Earlier tonight I mounted my Nikon on a LT104. Its height allows for scope clearance above my Troy BUIS. With the Butler Creek cover, there is no room to spare - perfect fit.
Top Top