User Panel
Posted: 8/5/2005 5:00:07 PM EDT
Rather than riding on the RAS-II vs Troy, I'm opening a new topic
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=12&t=245717 LaRue comes highly rated and endorsed wholly by Wes (MSTN). LaRue is single piece FF, while Samson/Troy are two piece FF. Based on your actual experience , how's a LaRue considered better or less versus Samson MRFS or Troy MRF? Personally, I like the looks of Troy/Samson on having a continuous top rail -- looking more like a LMT-MRP. |
|
|
|
The LT once piece FF rail is going to be the strongest of them all. If you can pull your own barrel or pay someone to do it then go with the LT rail. If you cannot then go with the TROY. C4 www.GRTactical.com |
|
|
THE PERSON DOING THE LARUE FOREND INSTALLATION DETERMINES THE FOREND'S CORRECT ALIGNMENT WITH THE RECEIVER.
WITH THE TROY DESIGN, THE PERSON WHO INSTALLED THE BARREL NUT/DELTA RING ASSEMBLY DETERMINES THE TROY FOREND'S CORRECT ALIGNMENT WITH THE RECEIVER. WES GRANT M.S.T.N. |
|
Samson MRFS
Two piece, so it does not require barrel disassembly once you remove the delta ring and spring. Continuous top rail so you can mount an optic anywhere. Shoot me an email if you want to learn more about Samson rails. www.TalonArms.com |
|
I reviewed back the BIG Post as well as all the related posts, and came up with these understanding :
LARUE - http://www.laruetactical.com/lt/handguards.html - one-tube design with three (or five to include the screws) associated parts to lock it in place. - hg cap, front sight, muzzle device has to be removed for tube installation - existing delta ring and 'traditional' barrel nut is not used, new barrel nut is supplied - has an anti-roll indexing device to lock the tube with the larue barrel nut to avoid spinning. - allen screw on both sides fixes the indexing device with the nut (in front-rear / horizontal lock) - anti-roll indexing device is firmly fixed to the front of the upper receiver and also indexed to the gas tube. - knurled ring locks the barrel nut in its place. (vertical lock) TROY and possibly SAMSON {as they were similarly designed} http://www.militarymorons.com/weapons/ar.uppers.html see the section going into the bottom - two-section rail : upper three-quarters and lower quarter rail, fixed together by clamp secured thru four allen screws - hg cap, front sight, muzzle device NEED NOT be removed for tube installation - existing delta ring is not used but 'traditional' barrel nut is retained - upper rail is fixed on top of the barrel nut, and clamp secures it in place. - two anti-rotation tabs on the clamp prevents spinning of upper tube - lower "rail" is secured thru a spring-loaded detent on the clamp as well as tabs between the upper and lower rail. |
|
i have found out that its basically up to the end position of the barrel nut on either installs. |
|
|
sounds like you really did your homework so which one do you feel suits your needs? which one do you prefer to deal with if your installing yourself? |
|
|
It all depends because the LaRue once installed is fairly permanent if you want to replace a mess up gas tube you have to remove the FSB which is a pain in the ass! I go with Troy MRF-C
|
|
No thanks. This one's an easy choice, hands down. |
|
|
though there are occasional stubborn fsb pins i have rarely messed up any gas tube. and once the fsb is removed once they're not gonna be hard the second time. anyways after you have installed the larue what reason would you have to remove it? |
|
|
TROY ? |
||
|
Uhm, ya, but no, at least not in my house. |
|||
|
|
The Troy is the simplest to install. If you have a dremmel you just cut off the delta ring and remove the spring and clip. You are now ready to install the Troy rail. As to barrel nut indexing, the Troy has a series of notches that engage the barrel nut that allow you to move the rail left and right to align it with the upper. If the barrel nut is properly installed these usually give enough adjustment to eliminate playing with the barrel nut. Align the Troy rail with the upper, attach the clamp with the 4 allen provided and slip on the lower section of the rail and you are done. The lower half of the Troy is removable in about 2 seconds for cleaning or whatever and the whole rail system can be removed in 5 minutes by just removing the 4 allens on the clamp and lifting off the rail. Troy MRF 7.0" are on sale for the month of August for $225 shipped with 3 Tango Down Rail Covers. I also have Troy 10.0 in stock. Troy 10.0 installed on my 18" Mid length gas 6.8 SPC Rifle Dennys Guns/ Global Tactical Supply Denny |
||
|
The original Troy MRF-C prototype had two pins that engaged the notches on the barrel nut. That was not for stability but to align the rail.
It was found that there was enough space in the notches to properly install and align the barrel nut, yet have it slightly off center. This caused misalignment of the rail system and required retorquing of the barrel nut to properly align the rail (similar to KAC, DD, LaRue, and all other FF rail installs). After hearing about the problem I had with the prototype and with feedback from AR15.com, Troy eliminated the alignment pins for the MRF Mod-1's. This simply required the user to do the alignment of the rail (no big deal). AFAIK, Troy did not use the pins through the Mod-4's (of which I had two earlier this year). Both Wes and Denny have mentioned that Troy MRF's again engage the notches in the barrel nut. Has Troy changed the design and went back to alignment pins? Corey PS Both the Troy and LaRue are excellent rail systems. They each have their strong points however, and the user needs to decide their priorities. |
|
No Troy has not returned to the pins. There are ribs in the upper rail that engage the barrel nuts. There are a number of these ridges a few degrees apart that allow the installer to align the upper rail with the top of the receiver. Once you have it aligned just tighten down the bottom clamp and the rail system is securely clamped around the barrel nut. Denny |
|
|
Huh. Just when I thought I've been through those things left, right and upside down. Learn something new every day! Thanks Denny. Corey |
||
|
Ok, I'm going through this dilemma too, I just ordered my RRA lower and I'm having the RRA upper custom made. The thing is, I don't know what rail system to go with, and I'm not sure if I live around around anyone that can do the LaRue fore end, which is honestly the one I want, preferably the 9" rail and have the front sight removed and changed to a low profile gas block (also LaRue). The Troy sounds decent after reading this and seeing the pics but I'd still prefer the LaRue. Any suggestions?
Damon |
|
Ask yourself a few questions. - Do you need a continuous top rail? - Do you want to be able to remove your handguard for bbl maintenance? - Do you think a 2 piece railed handguard is as sturdy as a one piece? - Do you have a permanently attached flash suppressor? - Do you ever want to hold the railed handguard like a traditional handguard and not use the vertical grip (assuming you're going to use one)? - Is the weight of the railed handguard something you want to consider? Once you can nail down your needs and I mean really nail them down, the choice will be obvious. |
|
|
In answer to your question, the relevance is the profile of the railed handguard. The Larue's diameter is smaller than the Troy which some folks prefer when using a railed handguard in a traditional manner. Nevertheless, it seems that in answering the questions, you have answered your own. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted: Any suggestions? Ask yourself a few questions. - Do you need a continuous top rail? Not necessarily, but I do like the look of the Troy...and the LaRue ring mount lol - Do you want to be able to remove your handguard for bbl maintenance? Never really thought about it, I suppose it would be handy, but I never really needed to in the Army either. - Do you think a 2 piece railed handguard is as sturdy as a one piece? I'd have to say no, and from what I've read the LaRue is rock solid once it's mounted too. - Do you have a permanently attached flash suppressor? It will be permanent, but I'm still up in the air on the style too, it will be a stainless barrell, 15" without the FH - Do you ever want to hold the railed handguard like a traditional handguard and not use the vertical grip (assuming you're going to use one)? Probably while I'm zeroing, yes. - Is the weight of the railed handguard something you want to consider? Nah, I'm not a wuss Once you can nail down your needs and I mean really nail them down, the choice will be obvious. Umm...ok...so LaRue, right? |
|
I think it is obvious that a two piece is more than strong enough, as the military require it. The Wt. and pounding that an M203 produces, also required two piece handguads to support the launcher by the new free float handguads, for one. The other is ease of maintinance, getting all the crud out that builds up after a time, thus needs as good an access as possible.
Jack |
|
hadI thought you're referring on how a VFG puts additional pressure on the lower rails, especially when used during 'stressful' situations. |
||
|
Quoted:
Samson MRFS Two piece, so it does not require barrel disassembly once you remove the delta ring and spring. Continuous top rail so you can mount an optic anywhere. +1 |
|
Good to see you back, Jack! Corey |
|
|
|
|
|
Taggage, as I am teetering on the whole dilemma of what rail system to go with myself.
|
|
I am right there with you. The two piece system is better in every way except for the added weight. The bottom rail on the Samson can be semi-permanently installed with a locking screw next to the captured detent. With that screw in place it is not possible to move the bottom rail a fraction of an inch. (Troy does not have either feature) Samson is also going to offer more configurations on rails than anyone else. PERIOD. Example: Samson CXF for the PRI flip sight. A Samson Mfg. exclusive! The real choose between LaRue and Samson is how far do you want to go to mount it? TalonArms.com |
|
|
It might be "more than strong enough", but is NOT as strong as a one piece FF rail. If I remember correctly there were some tests done with the SIR on this forum and there was a lot more flex than than with the 1 piece KAC FF rail (that was used). C4 |
|
|
THE LARUE FORENDS ARE MY PERSONAL CHOICE.
SO ARE TROY SIGHTS, LARUE MOUNTS, LMT AND STAG RECEIVERS, COMPASS LAKE AND NOVESKI BARRELS, DAN YOUNG BOLT CARIERS, PRI GAS BUSTERS, DIETER VERTICAL GRIPS, SUREFIRE TACTICAL LIGHTS, ETC. WES GRANT MSTN.BIZ |
|
Barrel maintenance???? Garden hose.................compressed air...............what else is needed????
Adding: Arguing that having a continuous rail for optics flexibility and also arguing that removal is easier is a self defeating argument. If you were relying on the continuous rail for optics mounting and you then regularly remove it for "barrel maintenance", your return to zero is null and void. |
|
It is two different arguments I am with you, Mongo, on not removing the system for regular maintenance. I bolt the lower rail on and leave it on. So, the continuous rail for optics is only valid in my case. Unless, I only remove the bottom rail. Then zero would not be affected at all. I like the two piece system because it is easier to install, I don't care about how easy it comes off. 3rdtk was talking about regular disassembly of the rail system for barrel maintenance and cleaning. But, he never mentioned mounting optics. That was me. So there is one more good thing about the two piece systems. More options. |
|
|
I'm not picking on any one person with my statement, as there are many that list the same advantages for the Troy/Samson. For those unwilling or unable to remove either a muzzle device and/or a FSB, they are a great choice. Just have realistic expectations on what you are getting, that's all. Except for monolithic rails, I'll probably never be sold on anything other than receiver mounted optics. YMMV. |
||
|
A member on this forum forwarded me some info on a group of SEAL's going through a sniper school. They had the optics mounted partially on the receiver and partially on the FF rail. They could never get the optic to return to zero. I always believed this to be a bad idea, but now have the proof I need.
C4 |
||||
|
A while back I recieved a used AR with a Samson rail on the front. I looked at it very carefully and dis-assembled and re-assembled it. I like the locking screw on the bottom that can be used to bolt the 2 halves solidly together. I will not argue that a 1 piece system may be stronger than a 2 piece. I am not planning on mounting optics on the front rail, nor will I fight the fact that zeroing may be a problem with it. To me, it's an accessory rail. Things like vertical grips, lights, and illuminators should be mounted there. My current build is a 14.5" with a pinned F/S. My choices are to either send out the barrel and have the F/S removed along with the sight, then a 1 piece FF forend put on, followed by the sight and F/S being replaced....OR....Put a 2 piece system on it like the Samson/Troy. Yes, I realise I could go with a non FF rail if I wanted. This is America (for most of us (not picking on anybody else)). We get what we want, when we want it, and as much as we want of it. SO I selected the Samson over the Troy because of the additional locking capabilities that the halves can utilize together, thus making it a stronger piece when fully assembled.
I talked with Rob from TalonArms about some of the precise factors of the Samson rails in comparison to others. We talked about weight, sturdyness, ease of application, rail match up and other things. I can only say this....Rob was extremely open and informative. He was not trying to get me to buy his product but the product that would best fit my needs. He openly stated that if I wanted "X" or "Y" I would have to visit other vendors. He also gave some vendor options for me to pick those items from. Rob isn't one to feel that his product is the only good product and if you don't buy his, you are buying junk. I buy my parts from who treats me with respect, who takes care of me, who is honest, and obviously who has what I am looking for. If I don't think somebody is being straight with me I will spend more money with somebody else who is true to me. I bought another Samson today along with some other items. The Samson rail will hold accessories (my optics go on my flat top reciever). I have a pinned F/S and I felt this was a very good route for me to follow. I already have one Samson and I can say I am not upset with it at all. Everyone out there has some valid points and discussions like this are great places for people to air out thier feelings and input as long as they are not just morons who aren't open to objectivity. I'll post pics when I finish my build. |
|
12 MOA at 100 yards! Dear GOD! Those SEAL armorers must be pretty embarased. As a Troy dealer I bet you could say emphaticly that it could NEVER happen with an MRF rail system. I can damn sure say that about a Samson MRFS. RiftWeaver, Thank you for the kind words. I am very glad we could help you out. And if you have a 12 MOA shift in Zero, I will double your money back. |
||
|
Actually it has nothing to do with the Armorers. It is just a bad ideal to split the rings (whether on a TROY or Samson). C4 |
|||
|
If they were off by 12" at 100, that was an installation problem. For all of you guys out there just reading through this, I will leave you with some very wise words from a very wise man.
|
||
|
I see what you are saying. But that is no different from loosening the mounting screw on your scope rings. Of course it will effect zero. My point is, if you don't touch the screws, it is not going to move. I don't use two differnt rings for optics, I use an ARMS #35QD. If you have a one piece mount like a #35, 36, 38, or a LaRue SPR mount, you are not going to have a problem. If you remove your rail, you will need to re-zero. But as you said before, there is no reason to remove the rail once you install. |
|
|
There was no mention of installation problem. The person believes that there is a real issue with putting a scope on the receiver and on the rail. They also mentioned that they were using QD scope mounts (which most likely means ARMS #22's). This could be part of the issue as well (as ARMS products will NOT repeat zero if they are stretched out. C4 |
|||
|
FWIW....
I have a Colt MT6731 that has a Leupold Vari-XII 3-9 on it. Originally it was mounted in Leupold rings on top of an el'cheapo B-Square riser (all of this being on the upper receiver). The rifle produced one 3 shot group that was 5/8" at 100 yards and would consistently do sub-1" 3-5 shot groups at that same range. At one point I switched to ARMS #22 rings and mounted one ring on a Troy MRF. I was no longer able shoot sub-1" groups with it. When LaRue came out with their outstanding SPR mount, I had pretty much figured out that I need to go back to my upper receiver mount and plunked down the money for the mount. With the SPR mount putting the scope back on the upper receiver, I am now able to shoot sub-1" groups again. YMMV. Corey PS I had also heard that rails heat up differently than the upper receiver and that might be part of what is causing these accuracy problems. It makes sense to me. But my rule now is to keep optics on the upper receiver. I dunno what I would do with an MRP or MRS, but it doesn't matter because I don't have either. EDITED to add that nothing here should be taken as an indictment of Troy MRF's. Understanding that one of the trade-offs with them is that they are easier to install but potentially less stable than a LaRue. For me now looking at rail systems as "accessory mounts" (i.e., no optics) it doesn't matter. That being said, here is the current configuration of the MT6731 I mentioned above: |
|
If the rail is tight and does not move, the only thing I would think that would cause a zero shift would be uneven heating and expansion (due to heat) between the rail and the receiver. That and perhaps that ARMS mounts were used.
My Troy MRF-CX does not have alignment pins--it is now 1 year old. It is rock solid and will not move, even after I tried moving it with a VFG. I did have to take a dremel to the rail because it was contacting the handguard nut--bad design or bad machining, I have no idea. Other than that, the rail is very nice. It does look slighly purple however. I'd probably go Samson for another M-4 type rifle, and Larue for an SPR-type rifle. |
|
What does Samson rail have thay Troy doesn't? My 1-yr old Troy MRF-C has the Allen head screw on the bottom rail next the push in lock.
|
|
I would loke to change over to LaRue 7.0 or DD rail. is DD rail that the military use's and what you can buy is there any different's in them?
|
|
It sounds like you have the third generation of MRF. They dropped the set screw on Mod-4. Corey PS Mods 1 through 3 were actually manufactured by Samson I believe. So the Mod-3 was where Troy and Samson split, with each adding their own improvements and moving on to Mods 4+. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.