Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 8/26/2005 7:59:15 PM EDT
no cost factor, only pros and cons.
Link Posted: 8/26/2005 8:02:10 PM EDT
AR10 <> AR47....

AR10 Factory Offerings = .243 Winchester, .308 Winchester, 7.62NATO, or .300 RSAUM
Link Posted: 8/26/2005 8:03:28 PM EDT
7.62 x 39 pros: uses existing lower, lots of inexpensive ammo available

AR-10 pros: better ballistics, wider variety of ammo (bullet weights, match/surplus, etc) available

Depends on what you want to use it for I guess. If you wanted a real accuracy package I would go with an AR-10.
Link Posted: 8/26/2005 8:06:33 PM EDT
sorry 308.
Link Posted: 8/26/2005 8:09:20 PM EDT

Originally Posted By propaneguy:
sorry 308.



.308 Uppers require a whole different lower. You can't bolt an AR10 upper to an AR15 lower very easily.

You can buy 7.62x39 uppers for the AR15 lowers...

The 7.62x51 is too long for AR15 length actions.

Is this what you were getting at? Or are we having a failure to communicate?

Link Posted: 8/26/2005 8:09:25 PM EDT
good point the 7.62*39 is only sold by wolf but cheap. steel cases with coating, thats a whole other topic.
Link Posted: 8/26/2005 8:09:26 PM EDT
What do you plan on using it for, hunting, target shooting, matches?
Link Posted: 8/26/2005 8:11:19 PM EDT
yes that is why cost cant be a factor for the weapon.
Link Posted: 8/26/2005 8:13:28 PM EDT
Target, home def.
Top Top