Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
1/25/2018 7:38:29 AM
Posted: 9/23/2002 11:21:50 AM EST
1. Can it be practically mounted on TOP of the A2 carry handle, with an ARMS #2 for example?

2. What is the difference between the 510 Tactical series and the 550 Military series units? The Military units are more expensive, but why?

Link Posted: 9/23/2002 11:30:11 AM EST
I can't say for the mount question; mine is on a flattop. I think the difference is the military are compatible with night vision (the 511 is too bright for the NVG).
Link Posted: 9/23/2002 11:56:25 AM EST
[Last Edit: 9/23/2002 11:57:01 AM EST by SMGLee]
You don't want to mount via a #2 ARMS mount, this will put your EOTech way to high for a proper cheek weld and zero. It will have a large difference in point of impact between 25 to 100 yds. Use a PRI goose neck mount for mounting to carry handle, and you will also benefit from co-witness with the iron sight.

551 and 510 are different because the 551 is mil-spec where the 510 is not, also the 551 is NV capable.
Link Posted: 9/23/2002 4:27:13 PM EST
If the ARMS #2 is no good, what mount should I use, and where can I find it?
Link Posted: 9/23/2002 5:18:19 PM EST
Precision Reflex makes a gooseneck mount that will work with the new M4 handguards, and it is perfect for the EOTech.

EOTech makes a gooseneck mount, so does ARMS, ARMS#39 is a great mount, but it will not clear a M4 double heat sheild handguard. most people uses a standard handguard, or a buttom M4, and a standard top handguard to clear the mount.

Call Wes at MSTN for more purchase info.

Link Posted: 9/23/2002 6:26:33 PM EST
Thanks Chen! I ordered one RPI gooseneck from MSTN. My handguards are the new double heat shielded type, so thanks for the tip and "heads up"!
Top Top