I too was curious/skeptical earlier this year and a few good folks here gave them a thumbs up and no dissenters. So, this past spring I bought one and have been very pleased with it. I also have a low'ish S/N RRA lower (read, "a bit older") and it is very closely comparable in quality and finish to the JT/DS lower, if not equal (and I think highly of RRA). Overall the finish is 99 percent identical to the RRA in color and matte. The RRA has forging marks (very minor) where the JT/DS doesn't and vice-versa. The JT/DS went together very well using RRA components. IMO, the most significant difference is with the FCG well area. The RRA has more metal removed in the FCG well. I speculate this means it hasn't been neutered by blocking the FCG well from adapting to NFA components, whereas the JT/DS has. If that is what that means, that's not really important to me anyway, as I bough it as my "spare" lower. My JT/DS lower has been mated to three different makes of upper receivers: Rock River Arms, White Oak Armory, and Alexander Arms. My results as follows:
DS lower mated to "x" upper:
--
RRA: has a very minor "edge" at mate junction (~.002 to .005 inch difference in upper/lower width on each side) but was otherwise a very tight fit (as in zero slop and a good thing); color/matte matches very well.
--
AlexArms: slightly less difference in width than with the RRA upper; fit was not as tight as with RRA upper, but again, little-to-no slop. As Aggie pointed out though, the AA upper is a more "glossy" and deep black (teflon) and the color/matte difference is readily apparent. It will pass the 25 meter visual test though.
--
WOA no noticeable difference in width; least tight of the three but almost imperceiveable even when looking for it. The color/matte matches 95+ percent and will easily pass the 1 meter visual test.
Overall, the beefed-up areas (I think it's called "webbed areas" or areas of thicker metal around mag-well and ejection port) of the JT/DS lower didn't match 100 percent to any of the upper's webbed areas. Again, a minor cosmetic thing and not likely to notice it unless you're looking for it.
The above opinion is absent of the most important element though - function. It assembled/aligns perfectly and has performed flawlessly mated with all uppers I have. It has accepted at least 10 different manufacturers of magazines without issue, including Beowulf, composite, steel, and of course aluminum USGI ones. Mind you, it's the one and only JT/DS lower I've owned/observed but it appears to be of excellent quality and I have zero regrets in purchasing it.
I'd say if: it is what is available to you; mine is representative of what any other DS one will be; you aren't loyal to a more established/well-known brand; the price is right... that you won't have any regrets either.
FWIW, I have zero connections with anyone at JT/DS and the info is simply a simple opinion of an AR enthusiast and consumer who almost knows what he is talking about.
Hope this is helpful.
-w