I'd ask a liberal which one pisses them off more and spree on whichever they dictate to be more evil.
Quoted: The newer one.
Teflon coating is fancier, and my rifle doesn't seem to want to drop magazines with the older, dry film finish.
|
OKay is dry moly new and old. To elaborate, Dry moly is mil-spec which means the military is fielding it. Teflon, AFAIK, has never been adopted by the military but is what I would refer to as "Civilian" or "commercial". You're comparing older Labelle mags to new production D&H. If my memory serves me correct even further, Labelle had a military contract but the magazine were dry moly as spec'd and not of the teflon sort.
If we're talking
Mil-Spec, Dry Moly is the cream of the crop. If we're talking
commercial- Teflon is the cream of the crop. (Someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) Some consider Teflon far superior to Dry Moly coat... Personally I just can't help but view them as "commercial" mags due to the finish. While they are nice, I've seen too many older Bushmaster mags and newer D&H mags busted at the welds for my taste. [Note, I'm not trying to get into a pissing contest but if you compare Labelle/Bushmaster/D&H welds to other magazines such as Colt/OKay the Labelle/Bushmaster/D&H welds seem too shallow and spread out. As a former welder, I'll just say that they do not seem to have the proper penetration.]
Sly