Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 11/8/2002 9:02:10 AM EDT
Would possession of a collapsible stock justify intent if I didn't own a pre-ban rifle? I hope to get one after the beginning of the year but lately have seen some deals on collapsible stocks and flashhiders and such
Link Posted: 11/8/2002 10:49:20 AM EDT
No it does not. Just like possesion of a 14.5" barrel without an extended FH is not intent to make a SBR. It can be used for lawful purposes if properly modified. The only hard fast rules are NOT EVEN ONE full auto part in a semi AR and you cant have ALL the parts for a full auto and you cant drill the hole in the reciever for the auto sear trip.

You can have a single full auto part though. I just sent a full auto carrier to Kurt to have it milled to semi specs. I also have a 14.5" barrel on the way.
Link Posted: 11/8/2002 11:09:03 AM EDT
That's what I was hoping. There is a guy in town here who is about to be sentenced for having an AR-15, an M-16 tri burst kit, and a how-to manual. Hadn't done it, but I guess the intent was there. Just wanted to make sure the other things didn't fall into the same category.
Top Top