Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 11/6/2003 3:16:36 PM EDT
I wanted to know what type of mounts are available for the ML2. I was looking at ARMS and GG&G mounts. Any suggestions what I should go with?
Link Posted: 11/6/2003 3:34:30 PM EDT
The Army uses the Aimpoint Quick Release mount. -- Chuck
Link Posted: 11/6/2003 3:42:19 PM EDT
Link Posted: 11/6/2003 3:45:34 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/6/2003 3:47:33 PM EDT by Lumpy196]
Knights Cantilever or Straight Mount or ARMS 22M68 with Cantilever spacer: [img]http://photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?iImageUnq=11431[/img] [img]http://photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?iImageUnq=12668[/img] Knights if you want rock solid and lightweight. ARMS if you want rock solid and quick detach.
Link Posted: 11/9/2003 4:21:47 AM EDT
Link Posted: 11/9/2003 11:59:58 AM EDT
I have a US Army Aimpoint QRP Railgrabber for mine. Excellent. The ARMS#22 M68 with cantilever spacer is also top knotch.
Link Posted: 11/9/2003 12:01:12 PM EDT
I switched from Aimpoint QRP to ARMS 22M68 because I liked the throw level design and QRP protudes out too far.
Link Posted: 11/9/2003 12:08:30 PM EDT
I love the GG&G Cantilever mount on my 458 SOCOM. I also like the 22M68 w/ cantilever spacer on my RRA M4gery. They are both rock solid. I would recommend either one. The GG&G is built a little stronger from the looks of it. Ed
Link Posted: 11/9/2003 1:51:11 PM EDT
Link Posted: 11/9/2003 7:57:37 PM EDT
I liked the ARMS a little better overall. Mostly the quick detach aspect of it. The spare battery storage on the GG&G is cool though. I had shot/checked out both and went with the ARMS myself.
Top Top