Anyone using the Command Arms SRS sniper stock?

AR-15 » AR Discussions

AR Sponsor:

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Anyone using the Command Arms SRS sniper stock?

Posted: 10/8/2006 9:51:48 AM EDT

Any feedback?
I did a search in AR15, didn't find anything.

Look like is has the Magpul PRS beat because it includes the rear monopod.
I hope it collapses SHORTER than the PRS.

But the price....$499.99

www.commandarms.com/product.asp?pID=116&cID=57

Posted: 10/8/2006 9:54:08 AM EDT

[#1]

Stickman?

Posted: 10/8/2006 3:34:44 PM EDT

[#2]

$500!

Posted: 10/8/2006 4:16:02 PM EDT

[#3]

I use it to hold up my tent.

Posted: 10/8/2006 4:48:05 PM EDT

[#4]

I have never used one nor seen one in person but it reminds me of Tapco crap. I don't know of anyone here that has one as I have never seen one in the picture threads. Most folks looking for a nice adjustable stock go with the tried and true MagPul stocks.

Posted: 10/8/2006 5:40:24 PM EDT

[#5]

That is over priced an ugly. The Magpul is a proven stock for less.

IPSC_GUY
SIERRA II ALPHA

Posted: 10/8/2006 7:08:52 PM EDT

[#6]

Put that on an AR and you'll have to throw it away!

Posted: 10/8/2006 9:18:59 PM EDT

[#7]

Quoted:
Any feedback?
I did a search in AR15, didn't find anything.

Look like is has the Magpul PRS beat because it includes the rear monopod.
I hope it collapses SHORTER than the PRS.

But the price....$499.99

www.commandarms.com/thumb.asp?myheight=350&mywidth=350&image=img/productImages/Sniper%20Stock/SRSpod.jpg
www.commandarms.com/product.asp?pID=116&cID=57

Once you get over the styling and the price, the SRS seems like a nice stock. I have never shot one but have played with one at the Shot Show.

I see the SRS as more of a competition stock and the PRS as a field adjustable stock.

The SRS low points for me was the plastic use (the original prototype at the 2005 Shot Show was mostly machined but was aslo slated for $650 retail). The high is the monopod which really is a thing of beauty.

Posted: 10/8/2006 10:59:29 PM EDT

[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Any feedback?
I did a search in AR15, didn't find anything.

Look like is has the Magpul PRS beat because it includes the rear monopod.
I hope it collapses SHORTER than the PRS.

But the price....$499.99

www.commandarms.com/thumb.asp?myheight=350&mywidth=350&image=img/productImages/Sniper%20Stock/SRSpod.jpg
www.commandarms.com/product.asp?pID=116&cID=57

Once you get over the styling and the price, the SRS seems like a nice stock. I have never shot one but have played with one at the Shot Show.

I see the SRS as more of a competition stock and the PRS as a field adjustable stock.

The SRS low points for me was the plastic use (the original prototype at the 2005 Shot Show was mostly machined but was aslo slated for $650 retail). The high is the monopod which really is a thing of beauty.

That sure was a nice thing to say. Now get that UBR finished for us!!!!

Posted: 10/9/2006 3:37:26 AM EDT

[#9]

It sure looks CHEEZY to me. I would stick with the Magpul PRS. It is solid as a rock, it is top quality, w/no chinsy crap to fall off.

Posted: 10/9/2006 7:24:46 AM EDT

[#10]

i remember writing down the link for it when i first saw it. for a match rifle you need heavy and adj for cant. for bipod use, just a monopod and adj buttplate. personally im thinking stubby with adj buttplate and monopod for my .308 refurbish.

eta, someone put a monopod on a prs with a bipod adapter on the rail.