Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Posted: 10/8/2006 8:51:48 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/8/2006 8:53:51 AM EST by KA3B]
Any feedback?
I did a search in AR15, didn't find anything.

Look like is has the Magpul PRS beat because it includes the rear monopod.
I hope it collapses SHORTER than the PRS.

But the price....$499.99


www.commandarms.com/product.asp?pID=116&cID=57
Link Posted: 10/8/2006 8:54:08 AM EST
Stickman?
Link Posted: 10/8/2006 2:34:44 PM EST
$500!

Link Posted: 10/8/2006 3:16:02 PM EST
I use it to hold up my tent.
Link Posted: 10/8/2006 3:48:05 PM EST
I have never used one nor seen one in person but it reminds me of Tapco crap. I don't know of anyone here that has one as I have never seen one in the picture threads. Most folks looking for a nice adjustable stock go with the tried and true MagPul stocks.
Link Posted: 10/8/2006 4:40:24 PM EST
That is over priced an ugly. The Magpul is a proven stock for less.

IPSC_GUY
SIERRA II ALPHA
Link Posted: 10/8/2006 6:08:52 PM EST
Put that on an AR and you'll have to throw it away!
Link Posted: 10/8/2006 8:18:59 PM EST

Originally Posted By KA3B:
Any feedback?
I did a search in AR15, didn't find anything.

Look like is has the Magpul PRS beat because it includes the rear monopod.
I hope it collapses SHORTER than the PRS.

But the price....$499.99

www.commandarms.com/thumb.asp?myheight=350&mywidth=350&image=img/productImages/Sniper%20Stock/SRSpod.jpg
www.commandarms.com/product.asp?pID=116&cID=57


Once you get over the styling and the price, the SRS seems like a nice stock. I have never shot one but have played with one at the Shot Show.

I see the SRS as more of a competition stock and the PRS as a field adjustable stock.

The SRS low points for me was the plastic use (the original prototype at the 2005 Shot Show was mostly machined but was aslo slated for $650 retail). The high is the monopod which really is a thing of beauty.
Link Posted: 10/8/2006 9:59:29 PM EST

Originally Posted By Magpul:

Originally Posted By KA3B:
Any feedback?
I did a search in AR15, didn't find anything.

Look like is has the Magpul PRS beat because it includes the rear monopod.
I hope it collapses SHORTER than the PRS.

But the price....$499.99

www.commandarms.com/thumb.asp?myheight=350&mywidth=350&image=img/productImages/Sniper%20Stock/SRSpod.jpg
www.commandarms.com/product.asp?pID=116&cID=57


Once you get over the styling and the price, the SRS seems like a nice stock. I have never shot one but have played with one at the Shot Show.

I see the SRS as more of a competition stock and the PRS as a field adjustable stock.

The SRS low points for me was the plastic use (the original prototype at the 2005 Shot Show was mostly machined but was aslo slated for $650 retail). The high is the monopod which really is a thing of beauty.
That sure was a nice thing to say. Now get that UBR finished for us!!!!
Link Posted: 10/9/2006 2:37:26 AM EST
It sure looks CHEEZY to me. I would stick with the Magpul PRS. It is solid as a rock, it is top quality, w/no chinsy crap to fall off.
Link Posted: 10/9/2006 6:24:46 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/9/2006 6:26:11 AM EST by infsqdldr]
i remember writing down the link for it when i first saw it. for a match rifle you need heavy and adj for cant. for bipod use, just a monopod and adj buttplate. personally im thinking stubby with adj buttplate and monopod for my .308 refurbish.

eta, someone put a monopod on a prs with a bipod adapter on the rail.
Link Posted: 10/9/2006 1:06:50 PM EST

Originally Posted By fullauto4u:
It sure looks CHEEZY to me. I would stick with the Magpul PRS. It is solid as a rock, it is top quality, w/no chinsy crap to fall off.


Make the PRS SHORTER (meaning collapses as short as a 6 position telestock) for those of us with non-monkey length arms and I'll buy another.

Here is my SPR'ish AR15 with a Magpul PRS and the mono pod.


Here it is with an A1 stock and the mono pod.


Now if I could figure out a way to mount it to an LMT SOPMOD or if Magpul starts selling the UBR stock...
Link Posted: 10/29/2006 9:12:55 PM EST
[Last Edit: 10/29/2006 9:18:06 PM EST by steven1513]

Once you get over the styling and the price, the SRS seems like a nice stock.

Kudos for Magpul's candor.
Link Posted: 10/30/2006 2:11:29 AM EST
+1 for the Magpul PRS.

The command arms stock looks like a cheezy gimmick and it is waaaaaaaaaay over priced. (IMHO)
Link Posted: 10/30/2006 6:32:04 AM EST

Originally Posted By fullauto4u:
+1 for the Magpul PRS.

The command arms stock looks like a cheezy gimmick and it is waaaaaaaaaay over priced. (IMHO)


+1

some of CAA's stuff is worth it, but $500 for a tricked out M4 like stock w/ a monopod would not be worth it over a Magpul imo
Link Posted: 10/30/2006 9:52:42 AM EST
It's standard on the COBB BA50T! Or sells separate for $440.
Link Posted: 10/30/2006 11:10:32 AM EST
I'll stick with the Magpul PRS thank you.
Top Top