Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
Member Login

Site Notices
10/30/2020 2:42:12 PM
Posted: 11/18/2008 11:11:23 PM EST
I am looking at both the Aimpoints ML3 and the new Micro T-1.  Like both for different reasons.  I have used the ML2 in the past and liked it.  In looking at the specs for the Micro - the  size looks really small??  Like 1.4 W and 1.6 H = where the ML3 is 2.2 W&H.

For those that have used the Micro - how does that small size look when it is actually being used on the range?
Link Posted: 11/19/2008 12:15:50 AM EST
The CompM2, M3, M4 are 30mm tubes.  The Micro T-1 is a 20mm tube.  However, you will not notice a difference in the size, esp. if you shoot with both eyes open as you should.

Go to www.downrange.tv/show2 and watch video clips Part 2 and 3 to learn more.

S/F
Link Posted: 11/19/2008 3:51:55 PM EST
Originally Posted By fjb:
The CompM2, M3, M4 are 30mm tubes.  The Micro T-1 is a 20mm tube.  However, you will not notice a difference in the size, esp. if you shoot with both eyes open as you should.

Go to www.downrange.tv/show2 and watch video clips Part 2 and 3 to learn more.

S/F


In the 2nd vid, when they demonstrate the return to zero, isn't that more a function of the larue mount being used?

Granted, the M4 is a fine optic, but that seemed misleading.  Or do the M4's that go to the .mil come with larue mounts?
Top Top