Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
4/22/2019 5:32:20 PM
Posted: 11/19/2008 12:11:23 AM EDT
I am looking at both the Aimpoints ML3 and the new Micro T-1. Like both for different reasons. I have used the ML2 in the past and liked it. In looking at the specs for the Micro - the size looks really small?? Like 1.4 W and 1.6 H = where the ML3 is 2.2 W&H.

For those that have used the Micro - how does that small size look when it is actually being used on the range?
Link Posted: 11/19/2008 1:15:50 AM EDT
The CompM2, M3, M4 are 30mm tubes. The Micro T-1 is a 20mm tube. However, you will not notice a difference in the size, esp. if you shoot with both eyes open as you should.

Go to www.downrange.tv/show2 and watch video clips Part 2 and 3 to learn more.

S/F
Link Posted: 11/19/2008 4:51:55 PM EDT
Originally Posted By fjb:
The CompM2, M3, M4 are 30mm tubes. The Micro T-1 is a 20mm tube. However, you will not notice a difference in the size, esp. if you shoot with both eyes open as you should.

Go to www.downrange.tv/show2 and watch video clips Part 2 and 3 to learn more.

S/F


In the 2nd vid, when they demonstrate the return to zero, isn't that more a function of the larue mount being used?

Granted, the M4 is a fine optic, but that seemed misleading. Or do the M4's that go to the .mil come with larue mounts?
Top Top