Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
11/24/2017 4:44:23 PM
11/22/2017 10:05:29 PM
Posted: 10/8/2004 4:34:48 PM EST
What's the difference?

Looking at the data on Aimpoint's site, the only things I can come up with are that the ML2 is hard anodized, has a higher depth rating and comes with flip-up lens caps. Both are 30mm, have the CET diode, are parallax free and feature 9 brightness settings with a 4MOA dot. I've seen the COMP-C for significantly cheaper than the ML-2, and I don't necessarily need "mil-spec tough"; the standard "Aimpoint tough" should be fine for me. Any reason NOT to look for a COMP-C instead of an ML2?

Link Posted: 10/8/2004 5:08:23 PM EST
Link Posted: 10/8/2004 9:03:38 PM EST

Originally Posted By C4iGrant:
The Comp C is an excellent choice and you can always add the flip up cover later if you want....

C4

www.gandrtactical.com



You know you're making it very difficult for me to pay off my credit card. Its even more difficult because I not only see it here, I see it at GT as well! Everytime I see that hotlink I go right to the Aimpoints. They call to me. I better go lock up the CC before I make a rash decision.
Link Posted: 10/9/2004 6:03:15 AM EST
Top Top