Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 11/19/2002 11:17:33 AM EDT
whats the Differences between the Comp C & ML2 models? both 30mm, both come with lower wide mount, and lens covers, both 4MOA dots...so for the extra 50 bucks what do you get with the ML2? thanks
Link Posted: 11/19/2002 1:34:48 PM EDT
Mil-Spec vs competition grade, which means military use vs. range use.
Link Posted: 11/19/2002 6:38:29 PM EDT
ML2 is military spec, uses a 4 MOA dot, and uses a new CET diode which only requires a battery change every few YEARS.
Link Posted: 11/20/2002 8:20:34 AM EDT
The Comp C uses the CET diode too. The only differences between the Comp C and the ML2 are that the ML2 is more rugged, and waterproof deeper (80 ft vs 7 ft).
Link Posted: 11/20/2002 8:55:07 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/20/2002 8:55:17 AM EDT by SMGLee]
That's what I said.
Link Posted: 11/20/2002 11:17:54 AM EDT
I thought that the Comp M and ML were mil-spec until the M2 and ML2 were developed by Aimpoint last year.

Why was the military buying the Aimpoints for if they weren't mil-spec for the last five or so years?
Link Posted: 11/20/2002 7:01:41 PM EDT
He is talking about the Comp C vs the ML2. The comp C is build for the competition shooter that require a red dot for their race gun, in this field the C-more can excel. Take this to the rough field enviroment then you get the ML2 which is mil-spec and it is rugged enough to handle the rough and tumble handling of a soldier. this is where Comp C or the horrible C-more can fail in a fire fight.
Top Top