User Panel
Posted: 12/3/2007 2:05:54 PM EDT
Ok, I hold no grudge versus the round, the company who created it (met Bill last Jan at SHOT in a tiny booth in Orlando, nice guy!) or anyone who shoots it. I asked this question in another thread and instead of ruining that thread I want it to be in a new thread. The question is posed simply:
Has the 6.5 grendel seen combat? I dont doubt it is state of the art, it was designed within the last decade so hey, that works for me, Im just curious if it has in fact seen combat and forces are using it in ANY CAPACITY, small or large, if so great, just curious who is using it. If not, well I guess I would like to know WHY NOT? Fire away, and keep in mind Im here to learn why they use it or why not. This is not a thread to battle over which 6.x round is better or any round for that matter, because frankly I could careless which round people think is better. Just the facts please. If we all do our best to be clear, Im sure this thread can be informative and something everyone can learn from, I for one am eager to hear its combat status. |
|
Where is that can o' worms smilie?
Honestly I don't know but I'm sure everyone else will tell you. |
|
I have wanted the no BS answer to that question for a long time; just never wanted to be labeled a "troll" and get flamed........ Glad a mod asked.....
I have my ideas; primarily I think it boils down to politics in the military and bean counters. Secondly, I also hold the opinion that Bill dropped the ball, and has not pushed the round hard enough, especially with AR manufacturers and ammunition makers. Remington almost let the 6.8 slip away when it first came out, due to everyone, including myself, scratching thier heads wondering where the ammo was. But through no small effort, 6.8 has caught on due to manufacturers' pushing it, advertising, and actually getting barrels, bolts, and ammo out there for the shooting public. And no, I do not believe 6.5 has seen any use. I get my opinion from searching high and low through the net, and coming up empty handed with no hard facts. I would have one RIGHT now, if I could find more than DMR configurations. I realize they do make others, but I have not come across any w/o an insane wait time. Oh, and ammo.... |
|
The question is answered simply: Yes. John | 6.5 Grendel: The State-of-the-Art Combat Cartridge. | |
|
|
So, who is using it? |
|
|
Evidence or proof, anything basic would work... you know like public info, or maybe an AAR? Also notice a serious question deserves a serious answer. You cannot expect people to take that one word answer seriously. A yes does not really work my friend unless you could offer up something with that yes. |
||
|
I think that those who actually really know, probably can't say if the 6.5G or any of the alternative calibers have been fielded by any specops troops. Unfortunately we may not know ever. Only way we would really know is if a caliber was adopted by the military, and we know how likely THAT is!
|
|
There have been AAR for other rounds which have no formal military adpotion, with dedacted names etc. So while I see this as a possible reason why nothing is offered up, its not something I cant take that as a totally creditable answer only because other rounds have seen combat and AAR's have been posted. |
|
|
You could ask Gen. Bryan "Doug" Brown, or Vice Adm. Eric Olsen, they would probably know.
|
|
Hey works for me, if they want to stop by and say yes, I would take their word as they are in the mix and that meets my very minimum degree which is all Im asking for. I dont know them however and since I cant contact them, your answer does not really help. A yes from someone who has no mil or LEO record (at least when members of the board has asked Grendelizor if he has any mil or leo background ) does not cut the mustard nor answer the question to a sufficient degree. |
|
|
Source? And is it discussed on the 6.5G site? They really need to update it too.... |
||
|
Frankly. No. The ROE are maybe different; but they shall compile with rules of LW under US JAG definition. |
|
|
Well, Cold just said "combat" and from the videos I've seen I'd say it was combat or, like he said a "turkey shoot" I'll get back to this when I find something. EDIT, looks like it was all hear-say |
||
|
Yes I did and Im leaving the requirement pretty minimalist because maybe they can proffer something which everyone can see and were not stuck with this "its been done but its classified" business. If AARs with dedacted info has been posted willingly about other rounds, well why not about the 6.5 G? |
|||
|
If we are talking the same footage, the (in)famous "turkey shoot" quote is from Travis H. at the Battle of Al Najaf ... and he's fielding a .223 ... A number of rounds have seen "combat" or (COTW) but that does not mean "adopted". Sometimes very esoteric things make it to the battle field, even in single numbers ... does it really matter? If a member of a certain unit that has "leeway" in weapons selection takes a 6.5 x 55 into the theatre, does that mean the US has adopted the 6.5 Swede? The 6.5 Grendel may have very well been used in theatre, whether one single rifle or more. As mentioned, those who have the option to select their hardware are least likely to discuss it. You should know this |
|||
|
Cold I'll tell you YES, the Grendel has been used...Do I know by whom? I dont, Grendelizor might but Bill would be able to tell you who, if there is or isnt a who. But like Marty said, No one is going to say for sure who it is in a open forum....So you either can take what we say with a grain of salt, ask Bill or just come to your sense's and drop it ant |
||||
|
Yep, it's pretty clear that was a 5.56. I read some stuff months ago but when I went back it was just hear-say, military guys expressing their opinion. I also read that no one has produced enough 6.5 ammo for any major squad shipments but, again it's all hear-say |
||||
|
Well my Ant friend, maybe thats how you do things, the way I was taught to do things, you cant just drop something after you have asked a legit question a few people find unpopular or cannot seem to answer with some sort of supporting proof. Im not allowing this discussion to fall into a which is better, I dont much care. I am not in a position to select my duty weapon or choose between, X,Y or Z for a load out like some others are. Im just curious if there is anything out there which has proof positive combat use for the 6.5 G. If theres not, so be it. If I have to take someones word, I personally will take it from someone with merit. Others can make their own decisions and conclusions. DocGKR himself has asked a few members for creds when stating something and their failure to do so speaks volumes. I would think since the 50 B, 458 SOCOM and other rounds have made it over there, it is possible that the 6.5 G has, however, my question is, how come there is info about those rounds being used over there and searches do not yield anything about the 6,5 G? If im not looking in the right place, just link me, pretty easy. The threshold I set is pretty low, pretty easy to meet. Again set that way for a reason. Just curious if anything can be offered up which would validate it as a combat round. My interest has been peaked, and since there has been other dedacted reports from other weapons not adopted by the mil being used over there, Im just wondering if anything is out which could be shown for the 6.5 G. Again pretty clear. Open forum or not, its taken place for other rounds so I dont see any real reason it precludes the 6.5 G. I will be in Va this coming June working for the Government. I wonder if I show my creds, my colleagues and I could get a tour of the AA plant? Id love to ask Bill some questions for kicks then. None of this is instituted in malice, just wondering, and it seems others have too. |
|||||
|
You don't need .gov creds to tour the AA facility ...
I would use those creds to have an offline discussion with DocGKR, he can tell you about a number of things not suited for discussion here or on any other open board. The fact that some reports have trickled down about other rounds ... well, if you look at the redacted .458 report, there is now a big disclaimer at the beginning. Some of the aspects of the letter and the person writing it have met with serious questions from "silent professionals" (such as rank and supposed service not matching) Honestly, this forum is not the best place to discuss some of this stuff. If I make it to SHOT, I can see if we can sit down with some folks who can give the skinny on what has and hasn't been used over there. Let's put it this way "30-06, the original one shot 3-round burst ..." comes to mind ... I do believe that information has been made public ... so if 30-06 has been deployed in theatre, 6.5 G maybe as well ... |
|
Different approach to marketing? Yesterday evening I phoned Bill Alexander, told him about this thread, and asked him if I could share any details about the 6.5 Grendel in combat. After he finished laughing, he said, "Hell no! Are they bloody frickin' mental? They want operational details in a time of war on a public bloody hobbyist forum? No wonder guys like Pat Rogers don't take them seriously! If they haven't got the bloomin' security clearances to ask through the proper channels, I certainly ain't gonna tell them. What do they want? Name, rank, and serial number? Provinces? Cities? Dates? Might as well publish it in Arabic and make it easier for the buggers!" OK, yes, I think Bill is a little paranoid about this, but he takes seriously the trust earned with his clients. You've got to remember that his career began in the Cold War, and he explained that, if one knew where to look in public places, like university papers, you could find out quite a bit about what the Russians were up to. The Chinese were much better at keeping everything --- everything --- secretive. "America leaks like a sieve!" he says. After I talked with him a little more, this is what I got: "The 6.5 Grendel has been used in various capacities where U.S. military personnel are currently operational." How's that for you? Fine, roll your eyes. Deal with it. In most cases, Bill knows the entities to whom he sells his products. In some cases, they provide feedback on how and where 6.5 Grendel was employed and the results. In other cases, he sells his products to clients and he, himself, has no idea what they do with them. In a few cases, certain entities have provided feedback on their use of the 6.5 Grendel and he has no idea how they came to acquire his products. I don't believe he has any formal, military After Action Reports of the type that this forum would like to see. Cold, are you saying that you've seen actual AARs for the 6.8 SPC floating around the Web? If so, somebody please provide a link to them. "You're wasting your time," Bill said. "What if you told them everything? They'd point and call you a liar. Save your breath. . . ." So if you want to feel smug and say, "Ha! They can't prove to me that the 6.5 Grendel has shed blood in anger. I knew that cartridge could never cut it as a man-killer!" Then I say, go ahead, knock yourself out. Later, I'll remember this thread and chuckle. Hope you'll also find it amusing. . . . John | 6.5 Grendel: The State-of-the-Art Combat Cartridge. | |
|
|
Gren, this: "I knew that cartridge could never cut it as a man-killer!" , was never Cold's intent with this thread. He is not the type to bash another caliber like that, as witnessed from his being a fan of the 458S but appreciating the 50Beo just as much and not being a twit about "This is better than that" crap. As stated in his initial post: Fire away, and keep in mind Im here to learn why they use it or why not. This is not a thread to battle over which 6.x round is better or any round for that matter, because frankly I could careless which round people think is better. Just the facts please.
"Fire away, and keep in mind Im here to learn why they use it or why not. This is not a thread to battle over which 6.x round is better or any round for that matter, because frankly I could careless which round people think is better. Just the facts please. " Bill's response does not surprise me in the least. We went through this with the 50Beo as well and got a similar answer. It seems purchases were made for rifles, uppers, and ammo and shipped to interesting places, but that is all that is known or proffered up for info. Like he said, this place is like a bloddy sieve, in terms of information. I realize the gov releases stuff sometimes strategically, but sometimes things leak and certain people don't know to keep their mouth's shut. I'm talking about the media here of course. I hope these alternative calibers are being utilized by our troops in some capacity. I truly believe they are. Will one or a number get "adopted", well, that is probably unlikely. It would be nice, but at least we have a strong feeling that they are being used, which means that terrorists and bad guys in general are hopefully falling at the hands of 6.8's, 6.5's, 30-06's, 50B's, 458S's, etc. |
|
Cold's intent has nothing to do with the 6.5's performance, it's pretty simple in it's scope. I say again "this thread has nothing to do with the 6.5s performance" over.
|
|
Hi, I want to add one thing, please drop the issue, nobody worth a shit will identify which units or individuals are using it. What will you achieve by getting the true answer beyond yes? Remember, you are speaking in an open forum. |
||||||
|
Funny how when this issue comes up everyone becomes defensive. I asked a good question others are interested in and yet theres seeming hostility. Either relax answer the question, or not, but I will not allow this to go down the tubes due to people treating it poorly.
IF no one wishes to point to anything so be it, but I will ask and see if anyone can offer anything up. Its not even been here 24 hours, give it some time if nothing happens it falls to the wayside. Understand? Public forum as you said means I can ask questions, if no one can answer with something, then again so be it. Again if you cannot contribute, then read. No need to reassert the same thing others already have ...which has no consideration. |
|
Again no hostility was directed at your question, only that a answer will contribute nothing more than problems for the users.
|
|
Anybody have an online link to these 6.8 SPC AARs that Cold would seem to accept as a minimum standard of "proof of combat"? I'd like to see where the bar is set.
John | 6.5 Grendel: The State-of-the-Art Combat Cartridge. | |
|
Quoted:
Anybody have an online link to these 6.8 SPC AARs that Cold would seem to accept as a minimum standard of "proof of combat"? I'd like to see where the bar is set. John Maybe I was not clear enough for you, but I would think its obvious, I am not referring to any specific round. And this is not going to become a 6.x anything debate so be sure you understand it has nothing to do with that. I dont much care about one being better then another. There was stuff posted around for other rounds, someone posted a AAR for the 458 SOCOM, and other rounds in the last few years with redacted info. Its known AA sent 50-60K rounds of ammo over there. I left the bar pretty low for a reason, really anything that shows some combat use works for me, maybe we could see something. If not due to whatever reason well so be it, thats the way it goes and I guess I will have to settle for that...but everyone else can come to their own conclusions. This question has been up for less then 24 hours and some people are calling for this to be let go. Hmm why is that? I am not making claims that it has not, Im asking if so, is there anything public which can be seen, thats all. |
|
I understood that from the start and have zero interest in this being a 6.5 vs. 6.8. I'm gathering you've seen a military AAR for the .458 with redacted info and that meets your minimum standard of "combat-blooded" proof for that round.
I'm assuming that you are confident the 6.8 SPC has been used in combat. What did it take to convince you of this? And can I see it? Is that a fair question? John | 6.5 Grendel: The State-of-the-Art Combat Cartridge. | |
||
|
Its a pretty simple question and no reason to start a 6.5 Vs 6.8 pissing match.
Has any nations military bought the 6.5 in significant numbers? If so is that nation currently fighting in Afghanistan or Iraq. If the answer to both of those questions is yes then its probably seen some combat. If not, it probably hasnt. |
|
[quote}Well my Ant friend, maybe thats how you do things, the way I was taught to do things, you cant just drop something after you have asked a legit question a few people find unpopular or cannot seem to answer with some sort of supporting proof. Im not allowing this discussion to fall into a which is better, I dont much care. I am not in a position to select my duty weapon or choose between, X,Y or Z for a load out like some others are. Im just curious if there is anything out there which has proof positive combat use for the 6.5 G. If theres not, so be it. If I have to take someones word, I personally will take it from someone with merit. Others can make their own decisions and conclusions. DocGKR himself has asked a few members for creds when stating something and their failure to do so speaks volumes. I would think since the 50 B, 458 SOCOM and other rounds have made it over there, it is possible that the 6.5 G has, however, my question is, how come there is info about those rounds being used over there and searches do not yield anything about the 6,5 G? If im not looking in the right place, just link me, pretty easy. The threshold I set is pretty low, pretty easy to meet. Again set that way for a reason. Just curious if anything can be offered up which would validate it as a combat round. My interest has been peaked, and since there has been other dedacted reports from other weapons not adopted by the mil being used over there, Im just wondering if anything is out which could be shown for the 6.5 G. Again pretty clear. Open forum or not, its taken place for other rounds so I dont see any real reason it precludes the 6.5 G. I will be in Va this coming June working for the Government. I wonder if I show my creds, my colleagues and I could get a tour of the AA plant? Id love to ask Bill some questions for kicks then. None of this is instituted in malice, just wondering, and it seems others have too. I never once made a reference about which round is better....Thats a old story, and is a waste of time. You have your choice and I have mine. I choose to believe, what I am told from my source's and you can either believe what John and I have said or I guess, I suggest you ask someone how to find the AAR's or do as Marty suggested and ask someone in a private conversation. Maybe that will provide enough proof you need. I am sure that Bill doesnt give a shit whether anyone here care's to believe that the Grendel is used in theatre, his sales are climbing! Products are cost less. Ant |
|
I agree the debate is old but why even mention it, its not the context of the question. And yet, for the last few posts yourself and Grendelizor reference it. Is it possible for you to stay on topic or must you try and take the divergent road? I just am curious if anything is out, simply put and if so, does anyone have a link. Sales climbing? well great, Im not here debating that, you offer stuff which is ancillary to the QUESTION I ASKED, so again you contribute really nothing. As to the last statement " products are cost less" you failed to relay what you meant to me there... Swearing in your argument always gives it less merit but everyone makes their points differently I suppose. |
|
|
I am not confident that the 6.8 has, I did not say I ever saw one for it either. Try and stick to the question being asked. Once again your are going down a road I am not even TRYING TO TRAVEL DOWN, a la anything 6.8 related. This is a 6,5 specific question. Let me make it clear to you yet again. The threshold is so very low, (for me) anything out there, it does not HAVE TO BE an AAR, that was merely an example, just simply something which would lend credence to it being a round having seen combat, IF SUCH A THING EXISTS in the public, Id love to see a link etc, pretty simple. I am not asking you to declassify something if that something exists, I know you lack that ability. But is there anything you or anyone can offer up which is not prefaced by either 1) its classified/cannot be made public or 2) you have to take "so and sos" word for it. That has to be pretty crystal. IF there is nothing public and the public has to take "so and sos word" then thats the way it is, and I guess everyone can draw their own conclusions either way. |
|||
|
I think its a simple one and I even dummed it down significantly to boot. Yet, there is this penchant for people to gravitate to this 6.8 thing, its got NOTHING to do with that. In asking this question, I do not even expect that kind of info you mentioned above, I am just curious if there is ANYTHING that can be pointed to about the 6.5 use in combat. |
|
|
Here's a question that may satisfy as it has in the past been used by other calibers. Has Bill sent any 6.5 ammo to the military outside CONUS. I doubt very very much the mil. would use the underpowered Wolf ammo. Just trying to eliminate the testing I think we can all agree has happen with certain parts of the branches. So has ammo been sent over that anyone can say? I think deductively that would answer the same question.
Personally I don't give a hoot. But as a point, look at the weird nonofficial crap that was fielded in other wars. WWII being great example as there is so much data written on it in the public purview. |
|
If your question is really that simple, then, for my small part, no, I don't know of anything that exists "in the public" that would prove to you that 6.5 Grendel has seen combat. Whew! That was easy! So that's all I have, but others can speak up if they can contribute to Cold's inquiry. John | 6.5 Grendel: The State-of-the-Art Combat Cartridge. | |
|
|
Jesus. So what caliber bullet being used is a matter of fucking national security?
I have no dog in this fight but some of y'all are being silly and defensive when Cold simply asked question and requested proof of the answer. No one is attacking anyone here but you guys have full shields up. And if Bill Alexander really responded like that, he need to have a beer and get a BJ. |
|
See the problem with all this is, there are some on both sides that just want so badly for the other to fail they will use anything said, out of context, to further their agenda and then everyone has to be so guarded in their answers. Someone eventually is going to post that "see the 6.5 Gren has never seen combat their biggest fan/proponent even said so." But they will only quote the part they want, which will then get an obvious response from the Grendel Camp and big internet fight erupts, thread locked. If everyone treated each other as though they were guests in the others home and this was a in person conversation much more constructive dialog would happen. But as things are now everyone is always on guard about the others true intentions when questions are asked. Its ashame as both have very good qualities and both have weaknesses. The internet is much like cars. When people are behind the wheel they act like they are some big shit when something pisses them off , saluting you, high beams, horn, tail gating etc.. But make them get out of the 2000+ car and things change very quickly. People can be very disrespectful when anonymous, thousands of miles away, over the internet in ways they would never act in a face to face conversation. I personally think someone somewhere has shot someone with the 6.5 G while performing there duties to their country. |
||
|
Ah, that does work, glad you could tell me. Like I said the threshold was very low for a reason, if there was ANYTHING even close which was public... well just put it forth, its an open invitation on a public board. I will of course see if anyone else has anything. Im not asking for someone to emerge out of the shadows say they used it, provide photos of them using it and risk anything as a result. Just was wondering if there is any public information out there. Your one vocal source so if you say it has not seen combat by my low threshold of understanding then well, people can draw there own conclusions. ETA: In reply to Tim_W: I dont want to see any round fail. But this is not about whether which 6.x will live or die. Once again its pretty clear. CQTover, thanks, I was wondering if I was the only one who noticed that too. |
||
|
Cold, your intentions weren't the ones I was referring to. Neither was your question or its validity. I just think there's a general distrust of the intentions behind all questioned asked by anyone who has shown a preference. Even if the intentions of the individual are straight forward as yours are. I think thats why it took so long to get an answer from anyone as everyone is thinking OK what is he really trying to get at or who's going to take this later on and use it out of context. This is obvious by all the "so wheres the 6.8s proof " hints in a thread that it hasn't been brought up by the poster.
|
|
Let me make a more precise summation: I cannot prove to you, by your threshold of proof, that 6.5 Grendel has seen combat. I've already gone on record as stating that, yes, it actually has seen combat. I'm content to let time prove out the truth of the matter. Here's a question that occurs to me, Cold: What if I could prove to you the issue with, oh, the same level of proof that you have for the .458? Your curiosity is simply assuaged? You run out and buy a Grendel? What would your response be? John | 6.5 Grendel: The State-of-the-Art Combat Cartridge. | |
|
|
I did a google search "6.5 Grendel" and lets just say that the 6.?'s arguement is on every single board out there! Some where not even gun related..went about 7-8 pages into the search and didnt find anything about the Grendel in Iraq or Afgah...
But there was one point that most agree'd on was that the 5.56 was not working..Unless it was 77gr or what ever they use. |
|
No, Tim, I'm already satisfied, based on the testimony of PauloSantos, that the 6.8 SPC has seen combat, or least been in theater. I'd like to see a 6.8 AAR because I'd like to see a 6.8 AAR. If I still have any secret and lingering doubts about recent 6.8 developments, it's about the one million rounds supposedly loaded by Black Hills for the military, which, I'd think (but I could be wrong) would show up as a roughly $500,000 contract on www.fbo.gov. But I'm not worried about the combat issue. Stuff is "field tested" all the time. Does that surprise anyone? John | 6.5 Grendel: The State-of-the-Art Combat Cartridge. | |
|
|
I think we just all need a big group hug.
Bigant: The 5.56 is a good 0-300 yard round. Don't believe all the crap you read. For every 1 military guy that bitches about the performance of the 5.56, there are hundreds of military guys that will tell you it works. With good shot placement, it works, even with the M855 ammo. Edit to add: Although the 6.8SPC and the 6.5 Grendel are both an improvement over the 5.56. |
|
And that is the real point of all of this. Not the other stuff. |
|
|
Unless my finances change drastically, I will in all likelihood own a 6.5 G at some juncture (the toy list is long) and the one I will purchase will include a cut rifle barrel from Sarten (spelling). I enjoy shooting a variety of rounds. I am a fan of the proper round for the job and when selecting a round for a particular job, I am merciless with respect to my investigation, its just how I do things. SHIVAN and I messaged shortly about pronghorn and the use of the 6.5 G for ranges out to 600 yards. That being said, unless its a duty weapon or some issued load out. All my choices have been for pure sporting purposes, either 3 gun, action rifle matches or in the woods. I am going to get a 50 B as well for some side by side shoot outs and for kicks. Variety is the spice of life and anyone who has went to the range with me or shot a match knows I am not a fan of just one round in particular. In response to your last statement I would say this, if you could provide such info, why not do so already within the thread if such info is public? Conditional statements don't hold a lot of water with me. I am not asking for someone to emerge from the shadows, state his use of the 6,5G, provide photos and then simply to offer his creds as the backbone. Im well aware of the liability that poses. My question was simply is there anything on public record which is validated. |
||
|
I think these are the answers as things now stand:
Is there any proof in the public domain that the 6.5 has been used in combat? NO Is there anything in any domain that the 6.5 has seen combat and can't be mentioned in this type of forum? YES |
|
I'm new to this Grendel discussion as I've lately been giving it some serious thought to add to my collection. So you could say that I'm a supporter. That said, I find John's 'quote' of Bill puzzling. You see, after 41 years in the defense industry, I do have all the DoD clearances and SBI accesses and the 1st thing that struck me about the 'quote', "What do they want? Name, rank, and serial number? Provinces? Cities? Dates? Might as well publish it in Arabic and make it easier for the buggers!" is that it conveniently implies that there has been some use without specifically suggesting same. What's odd about that is that anyone with any training in dealing with classified information knows that you neither confirm nor deny anything. You never imply anything. You keep your mouth shut. |
||
|
Why can't it be mentioned? What kind of super secret squirrel shit is going on? |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.