Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
11/24/2017 4:44:23 PM
11/22/2017 10:05:29 PM
Posted: 9/29/2004 12:37:12 PM EST
[Last Edit: 9/29/2004 12:37:52 PM EST by Teknic]

I was looking at this scope and wanted to see if anyone has had luck with this scope. Thanks for your replies.
Link Posted: 9/29/2004 12:55:51 PM EST
[Last Edit: 9/29/2004 6:10:50 PM EST by El_Roto]
This is from their website:

One of the most desired parameters for a tactical scope is the Apparent Field of View (Magnification X FOV in degrees) for fast target acquisition and tracking of moving targets. Taking the AFV concept further than Trijicon ACOG (3.5x7=24.5) and Elcan (3.5x8=28) the ATN 4x12 SWATS has an AFV of 4x12=48(!).

Link Posted: 9/29/2004 5:06:16 PM EST
Apparent FOV is not bullshit, but a standard measurement usually given in a optic spec sheet.
IF you don't like that, then look instead at the FOV in degrees, this thing is said to have a 12 (!!!) degree FOV, like holy crap! THAT's HUGE! I would suspect though that in order to boost it that large that their is noticeable barrel/pin cushion distortion towards the outer edges of the image...
Link Posted: 9/29/2004 5:09:53 PM EST
Note the eyerelief, only 2 inches, that's were they came up with some of the FOV, but still it's HUGE!
Also note how much the dang thing weighs! Makes an ELCAN look light and handy.....
Link Posted: 9/29/2004 6:10:19 PM EST
Thank you for correcting. my completely mistaken assumption about the Apparent FOV. I'll delete that immediately.

I did notice the weight! That would definitely make for a tippy weapon if mounted on the carry handle.
Link Posted: 9/29/2004 8:20:04 PM EST
Optics is one of the most confusing thing. Trying to find the right one without overpaying is tough.
Top Top