

Posted: 7/20/2017 7:43:41 AM EST
I know Omen and Falker make these. However at a $5000 price tag I was out of the running.
So here is my question, is it possible to get a billet receiver that is extended? That seems to be the hardest part to get so far. Once I can get that or even find a cnc machinist to make it, the rest will fall in line. Am I being to simplistic in my idea, or will the cost of parts still be up to that 5k? |
|
Here is another.
http://onlylongrange.com/bn36-long-range-assassin-300-win-mag-7mm-rem-mag/ Sure, you could make one from scratch, but it'd be a lot more than the lower. I suspect the upper, even the bcg and buffer must need to be longer. |
|
I find semi auto gets really complicated when the caliber gets larger. You have to use only certain loads (or brands) of ammo or else it will not feed properly. Plus you really want to reload when you get into these magnum calibers since the brass is going to get expensive. Semi autos tend to throw brass into places where you can't reach. My experience with AR10 basically says that it's too heavy and too much for things to go wrong, not to mention expensive.
This is really where you want bolt action. |
|
It's not going to happen short of you having some sort of engineering background and spending much more than $5k in R&D.
This isn't just an issue of receivers. You'll need a barrel with a correctly sized extension for what is going to be a custom bolt. Bolt Carrier is going to have to be custom as well to accommodate the additional receiver length. What mags will you use? Do you understand how everything relates together when it comes to figuring out the exact placement and tolerances for the carrier bore, magwell, FCG pocket, etc.? If it was as easy as you seem to think (paying a few hundred bucks to a machinist for him to just machine something for which there is no set standard), then a lot more than a small handful of companies would be making and selling them for cheaper than $5k. |
|
You are really not going to find a good one for less that than $5K, we have couple of companies here in Montana that build them, but they are damn expensive and to have one machined would cost a whole bunch more!
|
|
For 5k, buy a mill and a lathe (both together will cost less than 5K if you choose wisely!), some toolings, and get one of these:
http://www.cncguns.com/forum/index.php?topic=1344.0 Costs around 200 dollars but the REALLY hard part is done. Then PTG bolts, and barrel (you can get factory barrel in 300 win mag for less than 50 dollars on ebay) and assorted other parts like trigger, bottom metal, stocks, etc. Not a semi auto, or AR related, but it gets you a 300 win mag. Alternatively you could just buy a Remington 700 BDL for around 400 dollars. That 300 win mag AR is so expensive probably because of the amount of R&D involved. A Semi auto is more complicated, and to add length you have to add length to a bunch of parts, and then they gotta work without it falling apart. But if I had 5K to spend on a single rifle I'd buy machines and make them myself... I get the machines, and the rifle is off the books. |
|
It seems that there is more than what I anticipated. The info is good. I do reload and I do have a bolt action. It has been very accurate (out of the box rifle) and the mess ups are my own doing. I just was wondering about the semi. In regards to all the info above, and my lack of any kind of engineering I probably should stick with a bolt.
Thought that maybe I am missing out on something. I don't have a 700 but I do have a savage. I did check out Noreen. Is it gig? They are half cost of the others. |
|
By the way if you want to make a short action bolt action accept a long action cartridge (like 300 win mag) and don't mind being stuck to single shot, you could just install a 300 win mag barrel in a short action but in order to load, or unload the thing you have to remove the bolt completely, and drop the round in through the back.
It's certainly easier than making a short action semi auto 300 win mag. Though the same thing can be tried on an AR10 but your rifle will not be semi auto. By the way have you thought of 300 WSM? They do make uppers for it but you have to modify your bolt to accept a magnum bolt face. I read they are fraught with problems though, like the bolt breaking because enlarging the bolt face made it weak... http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_121/603810_AR_10_in_300_WSM__and_I_ve_got_problems__need_some_help.html http://www.cncguns.com/forum/index.php?topic=2237.0 |
|
Quoted:
It seems that there is more than what I anticipated. The info is good. I do reload and I do have a bolt action. It has been very accurate (out of the box rifle) and the mess ups are my own doing. I just was wondering about the semi. In regards to all the info above, and my lack of any kind of engineering I probably should stick with a bolt. Thought that maybe I am missing out on something. I don't have a 700 but I do have a savage. I did check out Noreen. Is it gig? They are half cost of the others. View Quote |
|
Surprised no fanboys are promoting the weakling 6.5 Grendel yet!
|
|
|
|
When I was on the tour, I asked them reloaders about the creedmore and the Grendel. In 1k yards they said it could be about the same. But after that...all WM
![]() So if I am building my own bolt now, what chases shout I get to with to mags? I heard they exist, but maybe that is a conversation for the precision section? |
|
@ SR- 72: No problem. I Don't mind seeing the topic take different turns. I have been enjoying the depth of information.
|
|
Well, honestly it depends if it's worth the cost to you... I don't know how reliable they are but the WSM uppers all seemed to have feeding issues (as in ripping off the rim and having to pound the case out after each shot). I hoped the 300WM semi autos have solved that problem.
For 5k you could just have gone with 338 LM and be able to punch through body armor even at 1000 yards. |
|
Quoted:
Well, honestly it depends if it's worth the cost to you... I don't know how reliable they are but the WSM uppers all seemed to have feeding issues (as in ripping off the rim and having to pound the case out after each shot). I hoped the 300WM semi autos have solved that problem. For 5k you could just have gone with 338 LM and be able to punch through body armor even at 1000 yards. View Quote ![]() ![]() I do like the LM though. It is a nice round. |
|
Quoted:
When I was on the tour, I asked them reloaders about the creedmore and the Grendel. In 1k yards they said it could be about the same. But after that...all WM ![]() So if I am building my own bolt now, what chases shout I get to with to mags? I heard they exist, but maybe that is a conversation for the precision section? View Quote As for gas guns in 300WM or even 6.5cm pressure will be an issue. For a 300wm you'll want to make sure that the gun can handle the pressure of the heavier 200-230gr loads since they are what gives the 300wm It's ELR capabilities. If you're cost minded you may want to look into a 6.5cm build on an Areo, I've been seeing uppers and other parts at great prices as of late and the 6.5cm is no slouch. If you want to build a custom or mod your gun with a chasis then take a look at these companies, XLR, Manners, MDT, Accuracy International (chasis), & KRG. |
|
I didn't even want to mess around with AR10's either. There's just so much fine balance between the weight of the BCG, the weight of the buffer, the power of the spring, the length of the gas tube, etc. that these all have to be balanced every time you change your load. Then you have the fact that the rifle throws expensive brass into never never land...
Then there's also the question that semi auto actions may not tolerate high pressure as well as a Remington or Weatherby action can... meaning shooting 220 grain bullets may end up damaging the rifle.. Some things are better off being bolt action or single shot. |
|
Quoted:
The Grendel and the Creedmoor are not an even comparison. 6.5CM can keep up with 300WM until you get into 300WM's heavier 200gr+ loads and by the time you get into the 230gr VLD's 300WM is in 338LM territory. As for gas guns in 300WM or even 6.5cm pressure will be an issue. For a 300wm you'll want to make sure that the gun can handle the pressure of the heavier 200-230gr loads since they are what gives the 300wm It's ELR capabilities. If you're cost minded you may want to look into a 6.5cm build on an Areo, I've been seeing uppers and other parts at great prices as of late and the 6.5cm is no slouch. If you want to build a custom or mod your gun with a chasis then take a look at these companies, XLR, Manners, MDT, Accuracy International (chasis), & KRG. View Quote Out of the mod stocks, which do you recommend? I Don't mind bolt action but the stock would allow me to get some mags for more capacity. |
|
|
The big win Mags are very much like an AR-10/LR-308, just... Uhhh More bigger-er.
![]() They handle the heavy loads just fine as long as you are willing to live with the chamber for them. Mod-1 and Mod-0 come to mind for pressure in these platforms. They will start dumping primers way way before you come close to over pressuring the system. |
|
Quoted:
I never intended for it to come across saying that it was a slouch. Sorry if it did. I have never used them. Going off Hornady's info (and I had already had several hundred rounds loaded), I thought I would stay wm. Just as it sits, to switch I would need a new rifle, mags, ammo, reloading dies and components. Plus start at zero rounds. It sounds like I can go higher grains with the wm. Out of the mod stocks, which do you recommend? I Don't mind bolt action but the stock would allow me to get some mags for more capacity. View Quote |
|
Noreen was the first to market with the production big bore ar's. Instead of asking why half the price why not ask why the others are over double? Gotta pay for the hot wife somehow!
For a production 300 Win AR Platform or the 7 Mag AR Platform its hard to compare when all the features are the same with the competition. complete rifle Noreen 300 Win and 7 Mag AR Platform Billet upper and Lower set Billet BN36 Upper and Lower Set |
|
A vid shooting Noreen 300 Win AR Platform and switching uppers to 30-06 ar
Badassness |
|
You could get this
http://onlylongrange.com/bn36-long-range-assassin-complete-upper-receiver/ then probably machine yourself a lower but I have no idea how the parts fit together or whether the fire control is anywhere near the same as milspec. They do sell 80% lowers but only for AR15 and AR10. Wouldn't hurt to ask if they can provide information on how to machine a lower... |
|
Quoted:
Noreen was the first to market with the production big bore ar's. Instead of asking why half the price why not ask why the others are over double? Gotta pay for the hot wife somehow! For a production 300 Win AR Platform or the 7 Mag AR Platform its hard to compare when all the features are the same with the competition. complete rifle Noreen 300 Win and 7 Mag AR Platform Billet upper and Lower set Billet BN36 Upper and Lower Set View Quote I don't know if NEMO was out at about the same time or before or what. |
|
Quoted:
Ehhh... Nothing against Noreen, as that is the target market for them, but they are very simple in design, and the cost of production is much lower. They lack gas adjustment for suppressor use also. I don't know if NEMO was out at about the same time or before or what. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
NEMO has not been around even close to the amount of time that Noreen has been around, Nemo used to be here when I live, I see they have moved to ID now. View Quote I work at NEMO Arms here in Idaho. |
|
Quoted:
Oh I know that, Noreen is a legend honestly, I was referring to the "Worlds First." I work at NEMO Arms here in Idaho. View Quote |
|
RND Manufacturing does some oddball big AR based builds as well.
In the 90s they were doing matched CNC upper/lowers before anyone else. It is what JP Enterprises used for their top shelf guns. |
|
You may want to look at the POF P300. looks like just over 3K. Their are more than a few pitfalls to the large auto loaders. As mentioned with the primers, along with beating up the ammo pretty bad. The guys that have it figured out have spent countless hours on this platform.
|
|
Been on and off for work. After looking at everything, I may stick with my bolt action...unless Nemo wants another field tester. I will do that for free
![]() I do appreciate all the advice though. I did see a rpr at my lgs and it was a little over 1k. Had the tac stock but I would need all new stuff. It looked good though. |
|
One advise if you go with bolt action...
Make the gun as heavy as you can possibly carry it, and/or put a compensator on the muzzle. I just shot my homemade 300 win mag rifle, and it kicked HARD. Hard enough that I really do not want to shoot this more than 4 rounds. The gun was not too heavy and I think this contributed to the harsh recoil. |
|
Quoted:
One advise if you go with bolt action... Make the gun as heavy as you can possibly carry it, and/or put a compensator on the muzzle. I just shot my homemade 300 win mag rifle, and it kicked HARD. Hard enough that I really do not want to shoot this more than 4 rounds. The gun was not too heavy and I think this contributed to the harsh recoil. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
One advise if you go with bolt action... Make the gun as heavy as you can possibly carry it, and/or put a compensator on the muzzle. I just shot my homemade 300 win mag rifle, and it kicked HARD. Hard enough that I really do not want to shoot this more than 4 rounds. The gun was not too heavy and I think this contributed to the harsh recoil. View Quote ![]() I may not be able to get all of this done right away but I can use the advice. Thanks. |
|
|
I'm assuming it meant adding lead weights to the stock to make it heavier so to reduce recoil and improve the firearm's stability.
|
|
Quoted:
I'm assuming it meant adding lead weights to the stock to make it heavier so to reduce recoil and improve the firearm's stability. View Quote |
|
I don't know but it doesn't seem like you can add weights to a M4 type telescoping stock... it would work on the A2 stock because it has a compartment in it for cleaning kits. While my A1 upper has light recoil it seems enough for me to lose target just a little bit.
|
|
Quoted:
I don't know but it doesn't seem like you can add weights to a M4 type telescoping stock... it would work on the A2 stock because it has a compartment in it for cleaning kits. While my A1 upper has light recoil it seems enough for me to lose target just a little bit. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2023 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.