Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
6/2/2020 2:34:59 PM
Posted: 12/25/2002 4:23:31 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/31/2002 2:05:46 PM EDT by travisone]
I have an 20" A2 with a B-Square carry handle mount.  My girlfriend got me a Burris Fulfield II 3-9X40 w/ Bal-Plex reticule for Christmas.  I've read that the ARMS#2 carry handle mount is hands down the best mount to have. What is the difference between the two mounts?  Is it worth the extra money to upgrade to the ARMS#2 if I already have the B-Square mount? Is the ARMS#2 any lower than the B-Square?  The B-Square seems unnecessarily high.  Any help appreciated.

Thank you,


I really need to know about the height difference please help!!!
Link Posted: 12/25/2002 5:14:11 PM EDT
The ARMS in my recollection is lower - it is also very well made.

If I had an A2 (I no longer have any) I would go with the ARMS mount.

Depending upon your use you likely do not have to upgrade.

Link Posted: 12/31/2002 2:06:07 PM EDT
Link Posted: 12/31/2002 6:23:09 PM EDT
You can B square or you can be accurate!
Good Shootin, Jack
Link Posted: 12/31/2002 6:31:40 PM EDT
Theres no comparison - go ARMS.
Link Posted: 1/1/2003 5:58:29 AM EDT
Agreed. ARMS all the way.
Link Posted: 1/6/2003 7:35:54 AM EDT
The Smith Ent. mounts are very nice also.
Link Posted: 1/6/2003 8:04:58 AM EDT
There is no contest, go with the ARMS#2 mount.
Link Posted: 1/6/2003 6:16:39 PM EDT
If I am not mistaken the ARMS is a dead on copy of the old Ultralux carry handle mount, right down to the nylon lock washer in the nut.  By FAR the best carry handle mount I have ever seen, does not shoot loose, and very good zero retention.  I like it much better than the B Square.
Top Top