Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 12/25/2002 3:23:31 PM EST
[Last Edit: 12/31/2002 1:05:46 PM EST by travisone]
I have an 20" A2 with a B-Square carry handle mount. My girlfriend got me a Burris Fulfield II 3-9X40 w/ Bal-Plex reticule for Christmas. I've read that the ARMS#2 carry handle mount is hands down the best mount to have. What is the difference between the two mounts? Is it worth the extra money to upgrade to the ARMS#2 if I already have the B-Square mount? Is the ARMS#2 any lower than the B-Square? The B-Square seems unnecessarily high. Any help appreciated.

Thank you,

Travis

I really need to know about the height difference please help!!!
Link Posted: 12/25/2002 4:14:11 PM EST
The ARMS in my recollection is lower - it is also very well made. If I had an A2 (I no longer have any) I would go with the ARMS mount. Depending upon your use you likely do not have to upgrade. -Kevin
Link Posted: 12/31/2002 1:06:07 PM EST
btt
Link Posted: 12/31/2002 5:23:09 PM EST
You can B square or you can be accurate! Good Shootin, Jack
Link Posted: 12/31/2002 5:31:40 PM EST
Theres no comparison - go ARMS.
Link Posted: 1/1/2003 4:58:29 AM EST
Agreed. ARMS all the way.
Link Posted: 1/6/2003 6:35:54 AM EST
The Smith Ent. mounts are very nice also.
Link Posted: 1/6/2003 7:04:58 AM EST
There is no contest, go with the ARMS#2 mount.
Link Posted: 1/6/2003 5:16:39 PM EST
If I am not mistaken the ARMS is a dead on copy of the old Ultralux carry handle mount, right down to the nylon lock washer in the nut. By FAR the best carry handle mount I have ever seen, does not shoot loose, and very good zero retention. I like it much better than the B Square. Regards Q
Top Top