Quoted: What suprise? federal make the ammo why not a FC headstanp? The LC is said to be better for reloading due to thicker necks(5.56 specs).
|
Nope. There is no 5.56 spec on the neck thickness.
The LC brass is better because of it's consistency, hardness rating, and equipment it is manufactured on. It has a history of outstanding quality.
FC, on the otherhand, has the thin webs and thick case walls, which is why it is not preferred to reloaders. If you dont reload en masse, then it doesnt matter.
On a positive note i read some posts where these two(FC LC) headstampes were chrongraphed and the FC has more velocity
|
That has not been my results - mine were just the opposite.
FC brass loads were 50fps slower than LC. But this could vary, lot to lot.
I recived 2 cases from natchez today, both have the FC stamp and a week ago i got 2 cases from midway and they too were FC's
I wouldn't/don't feel cheated.
|
I wouldnt either, but all things considered, I would rather have LC. I picked up a bunch at a local retailer. When I got home, half of it was LC, half was FC. I think it is just luck of the draw.