Past 200 yards, you'll appreciate that BDC.
Currently I am leaning toward the ACOG based on the fact that it is a more durrable design, has a BDC and reportedly better glass. However the Accupoints variable power and longer eye relief is a big draw. I have had ACOGs with shorter eye relief than the TA33-8 and got rid of them due to the eye relief. So which would you choose given my uses? Any major draw backs of the two that I am missing? |
The eye relief of the TA33 will negate that from being an issue. To me, it sounds like your biggest decision is weighing the importance of variable magnifcation.
Drawbacks on the ACOG, to me include a limited FOV on the TA33. It's not a big deal up close because you shoot both eyes open. Out far it doesn't matter either because it's a deliberate and concentrated shot. To me, the smaller FOV issue comes into play between 75-125 yards. I've always viewed the TA33 as the do-it-all ACOG as it does everything well but not anything 'perfect.' That said, for a general purpose optic it's VERY hard to beat.
Drawbacks on the TR21, to me include the solid triangle and obstructing post below it. For <200 yards it's awesome, past that I find it to be a real pain in the ass trying to get retentively tight groups. Too much in the way. That said, it still works fine for longer shots, but you won't get the same precision you would with the TA33.
One is better up close, the other is better out far. Still, I think the TA33 offers the shooter .. more.
I'd roll with the ACOG. My 2 cents anyway, hell I'd love to own both scopes.